Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Court packing was rejected when FDR proposed it to a Congress that did anything he wanted, but these Leftists think they will have better luck. Yeah, sure.


2 posted on 06/28/2018 2:02:54 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Repeal 16-17

FDR backed down because his own party wasn’t behind it and a Justice sold out, kicked the Constitution to the curb, and with the so-called “progressives” on the Court lawlessly gave FDR what he wanted.


7 posted on 06/28/2018 2:10:48 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal 16-17

Congress was a totally different beast when FDR tried to pack the Court. If Dems get enough seats + POTUS this WILL happen. Bank on it.


9 posted on 06/28/2018 2:10:53 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal 16-17
Court packing was rejected when FDR proposed it to a Congress that did anything he wanted, but these Leftists think they will have better luck. Yeah, sure.

I hope you are right. I don't think there are many Dems like Pettengill (see post #1) in congress today.

14 posted on 06/28/2018 2:20:54 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal 16-17
From History.com...

"...Most Republicans and many Democrats in Congress opposed the so-called “court-packing” plan.

"In April, however, before the bill came to a vote in Congress, two Supreme Court justices came over to the liberal side and by a narrow majority upheld as constitutional the National Labor Relations Act and the Social Security Act. The majority opinion acknowledged that the national economy had grown to such a degree that federal regulation and control was now warranted. Roosevelt’s reorganization plan was thus unnecessary, and in July the Senate struck it down by a vote of 70 to 22. ...

19 posted on 06/28/2018 2:27:30 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal 16-17

Even FDR’s VP was against his packing.

Most certainly, that would not be the case, should the ‘Rats get back POTUS and Sinate at the same time.


31 posted on 06/28/2018 3:27:39 PM PDT by C210N (Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal 16-17

And FDR tried to do it anyway. Little prick is the start of most of the crap we deal with today.


44 posted on 06/28/2018 5:57:30 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson