The word smiths chose the term “meddling” for a reason. It is legally and process wise meaningless to meddle. It is also impossible to prove or disprove, since it has no thresholds.
Actually 55% disapprove of Trump handling of the Summit is not bad given the avalanche of relentless attacks including the “bi-partisan” condemnation. Notice completely absent are the facts that even Rsoenweasel said the outcome was not impacted and the Russian TRIED and failed to hack the RNC.
Right! Where in the USCode is the definition / description of “meddling”? What does that even mean?
Just like “collusion”. Fake junk terms from fake junk people...