Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EagleUSA
This article @ CBS says a few things:
  1. New York is a one party consent state, hence taping was legal, equivalent of attorney taking notes.
  2. But yes ... it's privileged, and essentially the client, Trump, has control over it's being released or not.
  3. Trump's legal team explicitly waived privledge.
The question then would be of course ... why waive it? I can think of a few reasons given the nature of how Trump plays politics, but it's time for me to get back to vacation.
17 posted on 07/25/2018 8:20:47 AM PDT by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tinyowl
why waive it?

I guess because it will REALLY demoralize the Left once his approval numbers fail to go down again.


20 posted on 07/25/2018 8:24:02 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl
The question then would be of course ... why waive it?

Because then everyone will want to hear the other tapes, the one with "REPORTERS" that he references..

22 posted on 07/25/2018 8:24:43 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl
This article @ CBS says a few things:
...
3.Trump's legal team explicitly waived privilege.

I had heard this a couple of days ago. I guess I'm confused as to why Trump is complaining about the release when he authorized it. I could see complaining about the selective editing, but I would guess that was the media's doing.

33 posted on 07/25/2018 2:37:54 PM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson