Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The first complaint alleges Waters broke federal campaign finance law, and also names the California Democratic State Central Committee and Sen. Kamala Harris, a likely 2020 Democratic presidential contender.

The conservative National Legal and Policy Center is still drafting a second broader complaint focusing on the sources of money going to the Waters campaign and flowing to her daughter—and the accuracy of campaign finance reports, said Tom Anderson, director of the group’s government integrity project. Well before her current political fame, though, she mastered this somewhat-rare form of fundraising in slate mailers. California’s top politicians as well as local office-seekers have given far in excess of legal contribution limits to her campaign to be on her slate of endorsed candidates. The campaign then pays Karen Waters and other firms to produce, print and mail the sample ballots. The FEC approved the practice by Waters in 2004.

“Maxine Waters found an old provision and turned it into a cottage industry,” Anderson told Fox News.

However, the FEC complaint filed on July 25 states that the California Democratic party paid $35,000 to the Waters campaign in 2016 to include the endorsement of Harris’ Senate candidacy on the mailer. The FEC complaint, which cited an October campaign finance report, contends a third party is not legally allowed to pay for the mailer of a candidate without a reimbursement under the 2004 FEC advisory opinion.

A separate report shows that the Harris campaign paid $30,000 to the Waters campaign earlier in 2016 for a primary slate mailer, but no subsequent payments.

Neither Waters’ congressional office nor her 2018 campaign responded to phone and email inquiries. Karen Waters also did not respond to phone messages. A California Democratic Party spokesman and Harris’ Senate office did not respond to phone and email inquiries.

The mailers continue to be a lucrative source of funds.

1 posted on 08/02/2018 6:14:05 AM PDT by sevinufnine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sevinufnine

You can’t accuse Maxine of anything. Dat be rayciss.


2 posted on 08/02/2018 6:16:48 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

In November, Waters is facing Republican Omar Navarro, 29, a small business owner. The 79-year-old incumbent beat Navarro in 2016 with 76 percent of the vote, and outpaced him again in the June “jungle primary” (in which both parties can run) with 72 percent of the vote.

“She is going to be re-elected no matter what,” Anderson said. “She comes knocking and other politicians in California to say, ‘do you want my endorsement,’ because she knows they don’t want her opposing them.”

Her rising profile in opposing Trump likely gives her more clout, Anderson said.

“If you don’t pay to be on her slate, then maybe you’re one of Trump’s people,” Anderson said. “A local politician, like a judge, does not want to be on her bad side.”


3 posted on 08/02/2018 6:16:51 AM PDT by sevinufnine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Sounds like Maxine should be impeached.


4 posted on 08/02/2018 6:17:50 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

The countdown to charges of racism begins in 3-2-1.


7 posted on 08/02/2018 6:18:55 AM PDT by certrtwngnut (4- Do something,,,,even if it's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Maxine reminds me of the fat, loud, dirty politician campaigning throughout the movie Oh Brother Where Art Thou, only more corrupt and way more unfortunate-looking.


8 posted on 08/02/2018 6:20:48 AM PDT by sevinufnine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

9 posted on 08/02/2018 6:26:58 AM PDT by sevinufnine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

I’d say Maxine Waters had been hit with a Ugly stick. Cut from the Stupid branch.


10 posted on 08/02/2018 6:30:05 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Nothing will come of this. Laws are never enforced against the political elites, especially notorious people like her.


11 posted on 08/02/2018 6:31:30 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

12 posted on 08/02/2018 6:33:32 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Another moron that would’ve been fine if she’d been flying under the radar. Now she’s paying the price for being a play-a. She should be facing penalties for inciting her constituents to commit crimes (specifically, assault, harassment, and stalking). It’s ironic that Maxi-pad Waters, a lawmaker, is utterly unaware of California’s stalking laws, which are among the toughest in the nation. Most states have them now.


18 posted on 08/02/2018 6:53:15 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson