You’re all over threads posting this wacky crap.
FEC regulations specifically state that if there are other legitimate reasons for a payout then considering it a campaign contribution can be ignored.
It may come at a political cost, but there is no legal jeopardy. The feds tried it with John Edwards and it failed, if they try it with the president it will fail too.
Well here’s some “wacky crap” questions:
What would those “legitimate reasons” be for giving Stormy Daniels the money?
And not declaring the reimbursement a campaign doantion?