This, supposedly, is her biography:
>It makes no mention of her alcohol abuse and promiscuity (at the age of 15, continuing through high school and beyond). These are considered by the elites immaterial. These would be immaterial if there were reasonable cause to believe K. assaulted her. But, the only “evidence” against K. is the recovered memory of a person who had been abusing alcohol and having sex with boys indiscriminately. Of the few concrete details she provides, the names of the other persons at this party, every one of them denies there was any such part. Her recovered memory is, therefore, contradicted.
This whole thing should have been kept confidential.
Bear in mind that much of what we think we know about that comes from highly unreliable anonymous tweets and comments.