Moore gave such an awful, convoluted performance in that interview that he torpedoed his own campaign right there on the spot.
Let's face it, people -- that guy wasn't ready for prime time.
I'll tell you something else about Moore: He would have been the least reliable Republican vote in the U.S. Senate right now if he had won.
I think you’re missing the point here - it was not about the quality of Moore as a candidate. Any time you let smears stand, you will embolden the left. Truth is always important. When conservatives decide that the ends justify any means (or make them OK) they are behaving like the left.
No, I listened to Hannity the whole time. Whereas Rush would mention the case and move on, Hannity ranted and raved and said that women did not lie about such things and read and reread the salacious letters with relish written by the liars. He fussed and fumed and said the did not want a person in the Senate who did such things. He gave Moore a twenty-four hour time frame to call in to his show. Now, why did Hannity inject himself into that situation? He had ulterior, selfish purposes.
Just like he insists on injecting himself into this with: “I think she deserves to be heard.” Saying this after he knows better than anyone the snakes lined up and coaching her.
He is an idiot.
freepers seem to forget that in the primary Trump supported Luther Strange and not Roy Moore:
“The reason I originally endorsed Luther Strange (and his numbers went up mightily), is that I said Roy Moore will not be able to win the General Election,” Trump tweeted. “I was right! Roy worked hard but the deck was stacked against him!”