No, she didn’t. She asked him questions during the first few rounds, and then she remained seated where she had been the rest of the day.
Absolutely correct and during those three rounds of questioning Judge K, Rachel Mitchell got him on the record under oath directly refuting every single allegation of Ford so no one could claim the denials in his opening statement were not specific to her allegations.
Something else Rachel Mitchell did in questioning Judge K was really subtle, but highly effective. Before going into detail on Judge K's calendar, she first asked him if it had been changed at all since 1982 to which he answered no. That set up the huge contrast that Judge K's 36 year-old exculpatory submitted materials were unchanged while Ford's two month-old accusatory submitted materials had to be corrected by her that morning because she found errors in them. And while we're at it, it was Rachel Mitchell who gave Ford the opportunity to make those changes and walk right in to that trap.