Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court ends fight over Obama-era net neutrality rules
Reuters ^ | November 5, 2018 | by Lawrence Hurley

Posted on 11/05/2018 8:56:52 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

The legal fight over a 2016 lower court ruling upholding Obama-era net neutrality regulations aimed at ensuring a free and open internet - rules that have since been repealed by President Donald Trump’s administration - came to a formal end on Monday, with the U.S. Supreme Court declining to take up the matter.

The Trump administration and internet service providers had asked to justices to wipe away the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that had temporarily preserved the net neutrality regulations championed by Democratic former President Barack Obama. But the justices refused to hear the appeals, leaving the lower court ruling in place.

The brief court order noted that three of the court’s conservative justices, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, would have thrown out the appeals court decision. Chief Justice John Roberts and new Trump appointee Brett Kavanaugh were both recused from the case.

Obama’s rules, intended to safeguard equal access to content on the internet, were opposed by Trump, a Republican.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; biggovernment; brettkavanaugh; fcc; hussein; internet; maga; netneutrality; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/05/2018 8:56:53 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Temporarily is the key word here. Al Reuters is trying hard to deceive the reader. Translation: they gone.


2 posted on 11/05/2018 8:59:55 AM PST by jyo19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Finally....
The Executive Order which was going to turn Facebook into the Internet Gatekeeper for the USA has been killed.


3 posted on 11/05/2018 9:00:39 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

We better win tomorrow. Appears we have need of some legislation we aren’t going to get with Democrats in power.


4 posted on 11/05/2018 9:01:09 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists call 'em what you will they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Obama-era net neutrality regulations aimed at ensuring a free and open internet


BS description by Reuters. Net neutrality is not aimed at ensuring a free and open internet. Net neutrality is aimed at government control of the internet.


5 posted on 11/05/2018 9:02:15 AM PST by freedom1st (Beware the Beto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Obama’s rules, intended to safeguard equal access to content on the internet, were opposed by Trump, a Republican.

B. S.

6 posted on 11/05/2018 9:03:04 AM PST by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“net neutrality regulations aimed at ensuring a free and open internet”

Right...they would make sure everything was “fair”.


7 posted on 11/05/2018 9:03:25 AM PST by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jyo19

A SCOTUS smackdown would have prevented any future Democrat POTUS from bringing them back. This development leaves them on life support in cryogenic suspension.


8 posted on 11/05/2018 9:03:39 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

Trump should issue a set of regulations ordering social media companies to quit censoring speech and call it “net neutrality”.

Love to see the heads explode on that one.


9 posted on 11/05/2018 9:04:27 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Chief Justice John Roberts and new Trump appointee Brett Kavanaugh were both recused....”

WTF wid dat?


10 posted on 11/05/2018 9:04:54 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The Dummies are furious! They are counting on re-asserting net neutrality after Trump loses in 2020.


11 posted on 11/05/2018 9:26:04 AM PST by entropy12 (One million LEGAL immigrants/year is too many, without vetting for skills, Wealth or English skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Obama-era net neutrality regulations aimed at ensuring a free and open internet - rules that have since been repealed by President Donald Trump’s administration”


A blatant lie + a Hussein Obama butt-kissing + a compulsory Trump smear, all in one sentence.
Rotters is surpassing itself everyday in its Goebelian propagandizing.


12 posted on 11/05/2018 9:28:14 AM PST by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

We need to hammer the leftist justices with a recusal scoreboard.

Dems zero recusals, Reps 10,000+.

This is just more leftist bullshit!!!


13 posted on 11/05/2018 9:29:06 AM PST by pacificus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

ooks like 3 women are Obama loyalists.


14 posted on 11/05/2018 9:30:23 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I have mixed feelings about net neutrality. Those of us who have cut the cable and are using the Internet to access movies and cable networks are now being hit with bandwidth limits by the cable companies from whom we get Internet services. Of course the movie and cable channels they peddle in high price no choice packages are not restricted, but if we want to access our own choice of cable and movie channels through third parties we get loading issues or bandwidth overage charges. To me this is anti competitive. If I purchase a given amount of bandwidth what I access with that bandwidth is my business and should not be throttled back by my ISP to benefit their competing services. I also have a huge issue with municipal cable franchises. These are little more than camouflaged taxes on cable service and give consumers fewer choices for Internet access.


15 posted on 11/05/2018 9:34:30 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Thank you for pointing out that calling for internet providers to be treated like public utilities and provide their services without discrimination is NOT insane Communist stuff.


16 posted on 11/05/2018 9:42:51 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Hope that evil bwitch Bader Ginsurg and that sob Breyer are forced to retire soon!


17 posted on 11/05/2018 9:49:39 AM PST by ZULU (Jeff Sessions should be tried for sedition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Bandwidth hogs should pay more. Why should I subsidize your movie watching?

It will all be academic once 5G is in place. Most folks will be able to access the internet and therefore internet streaming via 5G with faster speeds and eventually lower costs.


18 posted on 11/05/2018 9:55:29 AM PST by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

“I also have a huge issue with municipal cable franchises.”

Demand that your local government get out of the cable regulation/franchising business. Mine did 25 years ago.

For many areas served by multiple technologies, including satellite and phone-line services, cable is no longer a monopoly.


19 posted on 11/05/2018 10:04:56 AM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

Most places are not served by multiple technologies. Some rural locations are not able to get decent service from ONE technology.

My choice where I live is between Verizon and Comcast. I loathe them both.


20 posted on 11/05/2018 11:22:30 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson