Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/07/2018 10:49:08 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

The court ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer more questions about the setting up of her private server.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said that the court denied their request to unseal the video depositions of Clinton’s aides.

On Thursday, a federal court blasted the DOJ and State Department on Hillary Clinton’s emails and ordered a discovery plan in 10 days as to whether Hillary’s private email system was intentionally set up to evade FOIA requests and lawsuits. (we know the answer)

TOM FITTON: Breaking: Fed court excoriates State and DOJ on Clinton email, orders discovery plan in 10 days as to whether Hillary Clinton email system an intentional attempt to evade FOIA. “One of the gravest modern offenses to gov’t transparency…”


2 posted on 12/07/2018 10:49:46 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Update: More from Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch announced today that, in a ruling excoriating both the U.S. Departments of State and Justice, U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth has ordered both agencies to join Judicial Watch in submitting a proposed schedule for discovery into whether Hillary Clinton sought to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a private email system and whether the State Department acted in “bad faith” by failing to disclose knowledge of the email system. The decision comes in a FOIA lawsuit related to the Benghazi terrorist attack.

Specially, Lamberth ruled:

… the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to plan discovery into (a) whether Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA; (b) whether the State Department’s attempts to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and (c) whether State has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s requests.

Terming Clinton’s use of her private email system, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” Lamberth wrote in his MEMORANDUM OPINION:

… his [President Barack Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell far short. So far short that the court questions, even now, whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal [Obama announced standard for transparency]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails? And has State ever adequately searched for records in this case?

At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.

Turning his attention to the Department of Justice, Lamberth wrote:

The current Justice Department made things worse. When the government last appeared before the Court, counsel claimed, ‘it is not true to say we misled either Judicial Watch or the Court.’ When accused of ‘doublespeak,’ counsel denied vehemently, feigned offense, and averred complete candor. When asked why State masked the inadequacy of its initial search, counsel claimed that the officials who initially responded to Judicial Watch’s request didn’t realize Clinton’s emails were missing, and that it took them two months to ‘figure [] out what was going on’… Counsel’s responses strain credulity. [citations omitted]


3 posted on 12/07/2018 10:50:14 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

They need to include Comey and Loretta Lynch as part of the conspiracy coverup.


4 posted on 12/07/2018 10:53:24 AM PST by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I doubt any meaningful justice for Clinton or Obama allies in this lifetime.


5 posted on 12/07/2018 10:55:15 AM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Hillary Clinton should be investigated for hundreds of violations of the Espionage Act. I don’t think FOIA violations cover the extent of her wrongdoing re her “bathroom server.”


7 posted on 12/07/2018 10:58:55 AM PST by thesharkboy (Charter member of the Basket of Deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

JW does an excellent job of prying loose juicy info, but since the DOJ works for the Deep State nothing ever happens with the info. After a year or so, everyone says “ thats old news, already investigated and we were cleared”


8 posted on 12/07/2018 11:00:40 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

What a joke.

She keeps getting 10 day “investigations into her DECADES long career of crime.

Yet, they have open-ended, perpetually funded investigations on Trup, where they never even NAMED a crime as its cause.

...and the “Republicans” in DC look around like Sgt. Schultz, saying “..Vee see noTHINGK!!”


12 posted on 12/07/2018 12:09:42 PM PST by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson