Posted on 12/10/2018 4:38:46 PM PST by ebb tide
As I understand it, Hagel’s big move was to declare an emergency, then loft a screwed up piece of garbage law to fix it. It was all a big lie, start to finish, just to implement some terrible law that no sane person would back on it’s own.
You’re right. We are being manipulated. I can just see it now, the Republicans telling us how important it is to get them back in control of the House in 2020.
Pray tell why?
Honestly, and I hate publishing this publicly, our only chance is a new party.
We’ve been saying this since Sarah Palin’s Tea Party time...
And the RINO Unipartiers like Jeb Bush and other Bushie people like Frum tried to start up things like NoParty parties, counterfeiting the Tea Party.
The elites read and digest Free Republic minute by minute, so for sure this is not wise posting this here, but that’s my two cents.
That's how they got Kavanaugh in. Two opposing (fake) arguments got them their compromised RINO candidate.
That is the point of the media argument of left vs. right.
He didn’t betray anybody. Read his book. He’s a firm disciple of stare decisis. The only people he “betrayed” were the abortion lovers who wanted him disgraced but never bothered to find out what his real views were.
He wasn’t referring to Hagel, the politician. He was referring to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who was a philosopher. Marx was one of his students (who took some of his ideas and extended/adapted them for the worse). I suggest looking up the term, “Hegelian Dialectic” or “Hegelian Dialog.” (Both of these terms refer to the same thing.)
Thanks Lurker... forgot Hegel was a mentor to Karl Marx.
No kidding, but it’s worse than that: Just wait until Justice Waffle is presented a 2A case regarding what he cited as the “second amendment ‘right’”...
Thank you - all the concern tolls are doing their thing and jumping on a headline w/o having a clue of what the decision was all about....I have as many questions about those who wanted to hear it as I do for Kavanaugh...ironic that those who get pissed about leftists legislating from the bench also get pissed when “their guys” opt to not push that envelope.
“This wasn’t a case about funding. It was about whether an individual could bring a lawsuit in the first place.”
I responded that the appeal involved many other factors including Judge's Bacharach dissent (Involving PPKM, not PPSLR) pertaining to 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(39),(p)(1) and Kansas Administrative Regulation
§ 30-5-60(a).
Please go back and read my post. There is already an explicit right to sue the State. The question is does the individual have the right to circumvent States where providers are deemed unqualified. The States are given plenty of leeway to determine entities that are qualified especially concerning Medicaid (In some cases, States can terminate contracts even if providers are qualified). Medicare involves longer and detailed measures. Also, there is already a mechanism of adjudication where PP can prove their innocence. Kansas or LA never denied PP their right to defend themselves.
Conflicting opinions based on the matter of States determining the qualification of providers (For some reason all involving PP) needs to be rectified. There is no law that says individuals can sue the State for legally determining if a provider is unqualified. Federal and State laws are clear. It is the courts that are screwed up.
I guess your post got nuked (Read it before I went to bed, did not realize this could be a religious forum which has rules for personal insults). This has nothing to do with Roe/abortion. I never even mentioned that. You just responded by a c/p of citations that were a flippant response by the majority of the court considering all the turmoil this matter with the circuit courts under them is causing (More likely protecting PP).
BTW, Kavanaugh is not “liberal” or whatever that means. Kavanaugh is a status quo go-along-to-get-along quasi Kennedy clone. A Statists of the highest order pertaining to law enforcement, weak on social issues, and sides mainly with free market ideals.
Yep
Thanks, FrankR!
Wrong again. This wasn’t a vote on the merits.
That’s just your opinion. It’s not Clarence Thomas’s opinion, and I think he’s more knowledgeable of law. I’ll go with him.
Yes, if you like what Perot did to us in 1992, by all means start a third party.
I understand the frustration, but the third party route is just DOA for all intents and purposes.
I know some folks are thinking Kavanaugh will not be good. I’m not convinced folks interpret things accurately. I’m not even sure some things that look bad, are actually symbolic of the true intent some folks have mistaken them to be.
It will take time.
Thanks Lurker51.
I got viciously attacked on here for NOT drinking the "Kavanaugh says he's an originalist and that will magically make him vote like a Scalia clone regardless of his personal views" kool-aid during his confirmation hearings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.