[Alberta's Child]

I'm OK with a deal to protect DACA immigrants under certain conditions:

1. The price in return has to be very high (like $25B for the wall and major changes to our chain immigration and asylum laws).

2. The DACA immigrants have to be given a path that leads to permanent residency status, not citizenship.

[mrsmith]

Well put.

Fact is that no one wants a “comprehensive” immigration reform but us and Trump.
The establishment wants confusion and fear.

[vikingrinn]

$25B isn’t ‘high’ - that one time cost amounts to a small percentage of the hundreds of billions illegals cost the citizens *ANNUALLY*…

NO. DACA.

[Licensed-To-Carry]

Well if you are going for that, throw in major voting reform, like eliminate ballot harvesting and institute voter ID with only US citizens eligible to vote.

[trublu]

That’s a good starting point. I also wouldn’t want to see a blanket path to citizenship. Anyone with any criminal activity in their background must not have a path to citizenship. There must also be a price to pay to get on the path. $500 a head sounds right.

[BeauBo]

Trump comes out for DACA kids, but the price is more than Dems will pay.

Pins the blame for no DACA deal on the Dems, just like last time.

[BeauBo]

What was the Goodlatte Bill again? Or Trump’s points from last year?

Fund the whole wall ($25B), end chain migration, end the lottery? Go to merit-based immigration criteria?

I guess we critically need asylum reform now as well.

In return for legalizing DACA who meet quality cuts, and more visas for skilled immigrants.

[libertylover]

I’m with you.