Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US climate costs will be highest in Republican strongholds
Nature Magazine ^ | January 30, 2019 | by Jeff Tollefson

Posted on 01/30/2019 8:43:34 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

The bulk of the economic burden resulting from climate change in the United States this century will fall on Republican strongholds where politicians have traditionally opposed policies to curb greenhouse gases. And as the impacts mount, they could potentially alter the political dynamics, says an analysis released on 29 January by the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington DC.

Researchers compared the projected economic impacts of global warming by the end of the century - including changes in mortality, agricultural yields and coastal damage driven by extreme weather and rising seas, for example - to recent voting patterns across the United States.

They found that vast swaths of the Republican-leaning southwest and southeast could see economic losses of 10-28% by the end of the century. Meanwhile, northern regions that include many Democratic-voting states, will experience fewer impacts and could even benefit from some of the results of climate change, including increases in agricultural yields.

All told, 15 of the 16 states with the most to lose economically from global warming voted for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in 2016, according to the analysis. Trump’s administration has worked aggressively to dismantle climate regulations put in place under former President Barack Obama.

The US states at most risk are part of a “barricade” that opposes action to curb greenhouse-gas emissions, says co-author David Victor, a political scientist at the University of California, San Diego. “The politics are flipped upside down,” Victor says.

Victor says what’s needed is more scientific evidence that connects the dots between global warming and local costs to taxpayers.

“That’s what makes it all palpable,” he says. “Once you understand the local costs - that tells you what the public needs to do.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nature.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climatechangefraud; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; hoax; propaganda; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2019 8:43:34 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Hmmmmm, I live in a “blood red” area, and nary a person has dropped dead from Climate Change.


2 posted on 01/30/2019 8:45:13 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

New scare tactic! Instead of “women and children hardest hit,” it’s now going to be “Republicans hardest hit!”

Take that, you knuckle-dragging Neanderthal deplorables!


3 posted on 01/30/2019 8:46:22 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

You know this is Fake News, Fake “Research” (Brookings, yeah)

If it was all true, why would the evil Dims even care?

They ask for genocide of Whites, well, there you have it


4 posted on 01/30/2019 8:46:42 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat ("Mods/Indies/Dems/Non-voters" JOBS or MOBS? Are CRAZY DIMS REALLY who you want BACK in POWER?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Funny how those global changes specifically target areas with Republican voters.


5 posted on 01/30/2019 8:47:48 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Victor says what’s needed is more scientific evidence that connects the dots between global warming and local costs to taxpayers.

Victor should have stopped when he said "what's needed is more SCIENTIFIC evidence."

6 posted on 01/30/2019 8:47:49 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sad that Nature has fallen this low.


7 posted on 01/30/2019 8:48:15 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Aren’t LA, SF, NYC, Boston and Miami all supposed to be inundated by rising sea levels. Since when did they become GOP strongholds?


8 posted on 01/30/2019 8:49:14 AM PST by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

We have a lot of AGW out there today.


9 posted on 01/30/2019 8:49:22 AM PST by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Researchers compared the projected economic impacts of global warming by the end of the century...

Ah, yes. The Unnamed "researchers" are projecting things...
10 posted on 01/30/2019 8:49:54 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; All

“US climate costs will be highest in Republican strongholds”

Uuuummmmm, okay, “climate change” discriminates...Who knew.

I’m going to file this right under a fresh pile of cow $hit, for safe keeping.


11 posted on 01/30/2019 8:50:14 AM PST by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Hmmmmm, I live in a “blood red” area, and nary a person has dropped dead from Climate Change.

Laugh now.

Wait till The Freezing-Boiling Tsunami Glaciers engulf your red county because you wore a MAGA hat.

12 posted on 01/30/2019 8:51:24 AM PST by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If that’s true, then what’s YOUR problem?

Let republican strongholds pay your boogie-man climate change consequences then.

I call your stinking bluff


13 posted on 01/30/2019 8:51:31 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

WHAT kind of twaddle is this article? Sounds like it was written by an 8th grader.


14 posted on 01/30/2019 8:51:31 AM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

And all of the crops die. Even the locusts shall feast upon their own. There will be plague, pestilence, outlandishly high mini-golf scores...


15 posted on 01/30/2019 8:54:19 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There’s that word again, “could.”


16 posted on 01/30/2019 8:56:26 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("We The People" have turned into "You, The Subjects.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Mine is currently -16 deg F.


17 posted on 01/30/2019 8:56:47 AM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

We have a lot of AGW out there today.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It’s 29 below in Minneapolis today. Global warming sucks.


18 posted on 01/30/2019 8:58:56 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

I seven-putted the clown’s mouth because of climate change...


19 posted on 01/30/2019 9:00:44 AM PST by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
BWAHAHAHAHA
‘Minneapolis has one of the largest LGBT populations in the U.S. proportional to its overall population.[11] Noted for its strong music and performing arts scenes,
[-24 now]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneapolis

Chicago -19 and clear.
Both are Not Republican Strongholds!!

More Fake News.

We need to keep exposing these horseflakes at every opportunity.
TWB

20 posted on 01/30/2019 9:02:15 AM PST by TWhiteBear (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson