Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative

One could argue that their votes would still count, as those votes would be added to the national total.

What would no longer count - electorally speaking - is Maine as a state. This ‘National Popular Vote’ idea is bad for a dozen reasons. And it’s particularly bad for smaller states. They are surrendering all their influence to the four or five largest states.

Which is exactly what the Founders were trying to prevent.


17 posted on 05/16/2019 6:25:21 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right

“What would no longer count - electorally speaking - is Maine as a state.”

That’s right. The founders had great respect for the roles of states as separate important entities and they went to great lengths to ensure states rights, after all it was states that originally created the federal government not the other way around.


51 posted on 05/16/2019 6:56:05 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

The movement can violate the voter’s rights in the state. Assume Maine’s or Colorado, or any of the other states in this movement vote for Candidate A, but Candidate B gets the popular vote, the decision of the state’s voters is ignored.

Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen, and should be filed ASAP as a violation of voting rights.


60 posted on 05/16/2019 7:06:45 AM PDT by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson