Well, if it’s actually in error, I’ll have to note that on Conservapedia…
Still don’t understand why he’d make that essay denouncing Christianity and Communism as irreconcilable and especially condemn Communism for it, especially when not even most Closet Communists infiltrating the church do that (I know Pope Francis and Vladimir Putin most certainly don’t do that, and they’re communists in all but name currently). And I still don’t understand why he would be friends with Nixon as early as 1957 if he were a far-left ideologue (especially considering this was after Nixon jailed Alger Hiss, which earned him undying bitter enmity from the far left, even those who pretended to be patriotic anti-Communist people).
To say the article and reference to that execrable Frances Rice piece is in error would be an understatement.
And, again, it’s very easy to understand when you accept that MLK Jr. was probably a fraud and a creation of outside forces looking to destroy our country from within. Claiming he was “friends” with Nixon is also not something I subscribe to by any stretch of the imagination. His goal was ultimately revolution, the left’s goal, and that was not a goal shared by the liberal Republican Nixon. When you need Harry Belafonte to be your puppetmaster/handler on a tv talk show, your ideology and agenda is about clear as the nose on your face.