Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump expected to end his fight to add citizenship question to census, sources say
ABC News ^ | 07/11/2019 | KATHERINE FAULDERS, ALEXANDER MALLINandJORDYN PHELPS

Posted on 07/11/2019 11:17:44 AM PDT by GIdget2004

President Donald Trump is expected to announce later Thursday he is backing down from his effort to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census, and will instead take executive action that instructs the Commerce Department to survey the American public on the question through other means, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

The expected announcement will bring to a close weeks of escalating confusion within the government over his demands that the controversial question be included despite a Supreme Court order that had blocked the move. The White House declined to comment about what exactly the president plans to announce.

As recently as Thursday morning, administration officials had been repeatedly suggested the president would take executive action calling for the question be added to the census. It was not immediately clear when and why the final decision was made not to move forward with that plan.

Attorney General William Barr, who is also expected to attend the announcement, will now have to determine a path forward for three separate ongoing court cases the administration is fighting in Maryland, California and New York over the administration's efforts to add the question to the census.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2019 11:17:44 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The citizenship question will never be on another census. John Roberts is an idiot.


2 posted on 07/11/2019 11:19:36 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The contents don’t match the headline.

Go figure.

SNORT.


3 posted on 07/11/2019 11:19:36 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The census will be invalid without that information.


4 posted on 07/11/2019 11:19:37 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Lame.


5 posted on 07/11/2019 11:19:51 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

There you go. Pull out the old schlong.


6 posted on 07/11/2019 11:20:01 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Absurd. This violates MY rights as a citizen with respect to Congressional representation


7 posted on 07/11/2019 11:20:19 AM PDT by RatRipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Why have a census if it doesn’t count how many citizens a country has ?


8 posted on 07/11/2019 11:20:25 AM PDT by escapefromboston (Free Assange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
The expected announcement will bring to a close weeks of escalating confusion within the government over his demands that the controversial question be included despite a Supreme Court order that had blocked the move. . . . . . Controversial to whom? Idiots? Crooks? Traitors?
9 posted on 07/11/2019 11:20:34 AM PDT by G. W. McLintock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Note that there is no prohibition on doing the Census again in 2021.


10 posted on 07/11/2019 11:20:50 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Just a little while ago the news was that he IS putting in the citizenship question.

Now they say he is backing off.

Which is it?

The MSM needs to get their act together, find out and report what really is going on.


11 posted on 07/11/2019 11:21:12 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I suggest all citizens refuse to answer any questions.


12 posted on 07/11/2019 11:21:41 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Whiskey Tango Foxtrot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Never say never, or even “not this year.”


13 posted on 07/11/2019 11:21:44 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Another case where “Trump judges” have done us no good at all.


14 posted on 07/11/2019 11:22:10 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

ABC News ...


15 posted on 07/11/2019 11:22:25 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
The MSM needs to get their act together....

HAHA!!! LOL!!!

16 posted on 07/11/2019 11:23:30 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Whiskey Tango Foxtrot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Dontcha love how everything the dems oppose is called *controversial*?

It’s never controversial when they support it.


17 posted on 07/11/2019 11:23:37 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

Shut up and pay your taxes serf /sarcasm.


18 posted on 07/11/2019 11:24:40 AM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Yes, they do. He isn’t getting the question on the census.
Instead his fig leaf is some other sort of survey, which will have zero impact on the fraudulent inflation of headcount for census purposes with the 40M+ illegals in our country.


19 posted on 07/11/2019 11:24:41 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

It’s not the MSM here, it is clearly the word coming out of the WH. And nothing new. In between, the judge didn’t allow the DoJ to swap out legal teams, but I don’t see how that should have made a difference. If the team they had in there wasn’t doing what needed to be done, they should have been fired.


20 posted on 07/11/2019 11:26:19 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson