However, I might hire her to work the corner down at the Pioneer Chicken stand.
Posted on 07/23/2019 6:23:25 PM PDT by McGruff
“I think one of the things I’m most concerned with is Kamala Harris is not qualified to serve as commander-in-chief, and I can say this from a personal perspective as a soldier,” said Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, during an appearance on Fox Sports Radio’s “Outkick the Coverage with Clay Travis.”
“She’s got no background or experience in foreign policy and she lacks the temperament that is necessary for a commander-in-chief.”
“I’ve seen the cost of war firsthand,” Gabbard continued. “I’ve experienced the consequences of what happens when we have presidents, as we have from both political parties in the White House, who lack experience, who lack that foreign policy understanding, who therefore fall under the influence of the foreign policy establishment, the military-industrial complex. This is what’s so dangerous. This is what we’ve seen occurring over time.”
Oh dear. This may draw a reaction.
But she could run a cat house.
I believe you need to be a Native Born Citizen to be the Commander-in-Chief. I hope Tulsi takes it in that direction.
Besides, she has too much gravitas...
None of the Democrats are!
Neither did Obungo.
Of course, neither is Gabbard. Being an MP in the Guard does not qualify her to handle geopolitical matters. She has no senior executive experience, as does PDJT, and she would cut the military to the bone, just like the rest of the Socialists running for her party’s nomination.
Smoking’ camels, Tulsi? Wndows down, the clown car is cruising. Tulsi takes the wheel.
However, I might hire her to work the corner down at the Pioneer Chicken stand.
Gabbard, you are a Democrat. That means you are not qualified to serve as commander-in-chief either.
By definition, you too lack “the temperament that is necessary for a commander-in-chief”.
You are a Democrat, which means you do not have the best interests of this country foremost, will surrender sovereignty, and display weakness, if not sell out the United States outright.
You are a Democrat, which means by default you are unfit to lead.
Yep. I agree with her.
and constitutionally ineligible
Tulsi Gabbard just may have a shot at winning the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination with talk like that.
I don’t think her positions would pull very many republican voters over to her side (pro green new deal, pro socialized medicine, pro Iran deal), but the Dems could do a lot worse than her... and they most certainly will.
Tulsi is one smart cookie. If I didn’t like Trump, I’d vote for her.
Tulsi Gabbard was born on April 12, 1981, in Leloaloa, Maoputasi County, on American Samoa’s main island of Tutuila.
We have ANOTHER pick of the globalist elite that is not an Article II, Section 1, clause 5 Natural Born Citizen.
Because of Obama’s 8 years, we cannot get the SCOTUS to adjudicate this Article III matter for the first time in US history.
Tuaua v. United States
According to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the people born in American Samoa – including those born on Swains Island – are “nationals but not citizens of the United States at birth”. If a child is born on any of these islands to any U.S. citizen, then that child is considered a national and a citizen of the United States at birth. In an amicus curiae brief filed in federal court, Samoan Congressman Faleomavaega supported the legal interpretation that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not extend birthright citizenship to United States nationals born in unincorporated territories.
All U.S. nationals have statutory rights to reside in the United States (i.e., the 50 states and Puerto Rico), and may apply for citizenship by naturalization after three months of residency by passing a test in English and civics, and by taking an oath of allegiance to the United States. However, the INA makes clear that any “national but not a citizen of the United States” who at any time has been convicted of any aggravated felony, whether the aggravated felony was committed inside or outside the United States, is “debarred from becoming a citizen of the United States”
Here we go again!!!
She didn't, no doubt out of fear of losing the left's support.
But Kamala works well under male leaders
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.