DANG!
A bazooka? Do they still exist? Personally, I think I should have my own personal Warthog. I’ll pay for the pilot.
An AA-12 with all ammo made for the unit.
I agree. Why CAN’T we have bazookas. Maybe with those, we could actually fight city hall after all.
Hot dang! Beta’s gonna join the NRA! I don’t necessarily want the latest and greatest, a couple dozen RPG’s will do nicely to lighten up those 4th of July parties.
He is just making acid comments trying to get people to make comments for which the authorities can red-flag them. He will never be held liable for his comments. I’m not playing.
Why not, i was trained briefly on how to use one. Bounce an inert rocket off the tank, so aim is good.
Doubt I can afford the ammo thought, My 105mm howitzer eats up my budget.
DANG!
I never wanted to own a useless bazooka.
Worthless Democrat, worthless stuff!
Besides, they're crew-serviced. Could you imagine what would happen if one hollered "LOAD!!" at one's wife?
The funny thing is, the only thing that's absurd is the idiot asking the question. Because if he knew squat about the Constitution, he'd know there is NO reason you can't own a bazooka. At least not any LEGAL reason.
Why not a bazooka, why not machine guns? Because we have let the government grossly violate the 2nd amendment with passage of the NFA and the GCA. With beto’s help we might just inform enough people to get that changed. What’s even worse for beto’s side is the fact that while the American people have the constitutional right to own machine guns and military weapons federal agents DO NOT. The government is allowed to establish the military but NOT an army of non military federal agents. Its way past time we disarm these unconstitutional federal agencies. Police power rests solely with the states.
See how fallacy works, Beto?
As to why I don't pursue having a bazooka, it's obvious and practical - in that having one would be completely impractical as a personal or home defense weapon. My AR-15 is a perfectly reasonable home defense weapon, and I can afford to maintain it and shoot it often enough to maintain nominal proficiency with it.
If I can own a pussy cat, why not a T-rex?
As far as I know, it’s perfectly legal to own a bazooka. It’s basically no different than a length of sewer pipe without the rounds. The rounds, though, unless perhaps if they’re non-explosive dummy rounds, are destructive devices and you’d have to pay the NFA tax on EACH ONE.
It’s also legal to own a tank. There are a good number of collectors out there. Rounds for the gun would require the NFA tax stamp for each one.
This guy is a felon and wants to get even with others over the rights he lost.
The Constitution includes the “Letters of Marque” clause precisely because the Founders expected some citizens to own battleships, and to - with Congress’s approval - engage in private wars with them
You can own a bazooka. Do the paperwork, pay the tax, go ahead and buy/make one.
But I'll settle for a box of Panzerfausts and a halftrack with a quad-fifty mount.