Skip to comments.
Beto O'Rourke: If You Can Own an AR-15, Why Not a Bazooka?
Breitbart ^
| 21 Sep 2019
| AWR HAWKINS
Posted on 09/21/2019 1:50:12 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
Democrat presidential hopeful Robert “Beto” O’Rourke responded to those who want to keep their AR-15s by asking why they do not pursue ownership of a bazooka as well.
O’Rourke’s comment came after a gun-totting mother in Aurora, Colorado, told him that he was not taking her guns.
O’Rourke later took to Twitter and wrote, “A woman in CO told me ‘hell no’ she won’t give back her AR-15. I listened, but by her logic: Why shouldn’t you be allowed to have a bazooka or a tank?”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; bobblehead; orourke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-188 next last
Indeed, why not? Beto Bazookas would be hot sellers. With him and other woke wannabe tyrants on the loose, we’ll need all the firepower we can get.
1
posted on
09/21/2019 1:50:12 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mr. Mojo; Army Air Corps
It truly is what The Founder’s intended.
2
posted on
09/21/2019 1:51:07 PM PDT
by
KC_Lion
To: Mr. Mojo
3
posted on
09/21/2019 1:52:22 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Mr. Mojo
“Why shouldn’t you be allowed to have a bazooka or a tank?”
Oh can I, pretty please Santa Betard??
4
posted on
09/21/2019 1:52:34 PM PDT
by
max americana
(Fired ONE libtard at work at every election since 2008 because I enjoy it. I hope every lib die.)
To: Mr. Mojo
He’s finality coming around!
5
posted on
09/21/2019 1:53:00 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Mr. Mojo
What a goober. Never ask a question that you don’t already know the answer...
6
posted on
09/21/2019 1:54:15 PM PDT
by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
To: Mr. Mojo
I want a bazooka. Semi-automatic AR-15’s are not military grade. Bazookas are.
7
posted on
09/21/2019 1:54:36 PM PDT
by
Old Yeller
(Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
To: Mr. Mojo
8
posted on
09/21/2019 1:54:37 PM PDT
by
ripnbang
("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
To: KC_Lion
Yep, every able-bodied citizen is militia member, and militia members have the same weapons as regular army infantrymen.
9
posted on
09/21/2019 1:55:08 PM PDT
by
Drago
To: Mr. Mojo
I listened, but by her logic: Why shouldn’t you be allowed to have a bazooka or a tank?” The Constitutional answer would be, there's no reason you shouldn't.
10
posted on
09/21/2019 1:55:34 PM PDT
by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: Mr. Mojo
Bazookas, so 1940 tech. How about Javelins or a M142 HIMARS set up? Or a M1A3 MBT? Heck, I’m sure someone would demand the right to a Russian TOS-1A since AK-47 are plentiful or even a AK-74M.
11
posted on
09/21/2019 1:56:14 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: Mr. Mojo
[ Beto O’Rourke: If You Can Own an AR-15, Why Not a Bazooka? ]
Hey Beto, I suggest your try and purchase a bazooka. Immediately.
No, seriously. I want to to attempt to purchase a bazooka.
Really, I do want you to do it. Really.
And while you’re at it, attempt to purchase a Javelin.
Let us know how that all works out for you, mmkay?
12
posted on
09/21/2019 1:57:14 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: Mr. Mojo
I see the very intentionally gun ignorant, constitutional ignorant Moron is running his mouth again leaving no doubt as to his stupidity.
His next argument will be if you can own a slingshot then why not a nuclear weapon.
To: Still Thinking
[He’s finality coming around!]
LOL - Beto must have gotten mugged!
14
posted on
09/21/2019 1:57:57 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: Mr. Mojo
If any civil defense force (the cops), can have Urban Assault Vehicles, then so shall any legal citizen own military hardware if they have the means.
15
posted on
09/21/2019 1:58:06 PM PDT
by
KobraKai
To: Mr. Mojo
To: Mr. Mojo
He must not know many of the founders owned cannons and lent and used them in the war.
17
posted on
09/21/2019 2:01:43 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Mr. Mojo
My neighbor says, “Sounds good, I’ll take two ! One for general defense and one special reserved just for this idiot. “ ha! My comment- this idiot keeps digging his whole deeper and deeper every time he opens his mouth
18
posted on
09/21/2019 2:02:10 PM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: Mr. Mojo
I want a reliable flame thrower too.
19
posted on
09/21/2019 2:02:16 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Mr. Mojo
Foolish logic. What is the purpose/use of a bazooka?
20
posted on
09/21/2019 2:03:02 PM PDT
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-188 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson