Skip to comments.
Beto O'Rourke: If You Can Own an AR-15, Why Not a Bazooka?
Breitbart ^
| 21 Sep 2019
| AWR HAWKINS
Posted on 09/21/2019 1:50:12 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-188 next last
To: KC_Lion
In the Founders era, private individuals owned cannons. Private individuals could own warships, otherwise being able to license privateers through “letters of marque and reprisal” would not have worked.
61
posted on
09/21/2019 2:30:46 PM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
To: Mr. Mojo
I think this piece of crap is working for the police state to create a database of those that oppose gun confiscation. What he is doing is baiting his opposition into making statements on social media that will be picked up by the surveillance state.
What a dick.
To: Mr. Mojo
Tanks are legal to purchase and own.
63
posted on
09/21/2019 2:31:53 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Mr. Mojo
How about a cannon? Aren’t they legal in most states?
64
posted on
09/21/2019 2:36:27 PM PDT
by
MagnoliaB
( You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you will find you get what you need.)
To: ThunderSleeps
Beat me to it TS
I’ve now lost count of how many old (EX)friends from the northeast who are appalled that I own ar 15s and other weapons
“why can’t you buy a grenade launcher then?”
You CAN! Want a bazooka? You CAN
Just pay the ATF the large applicable explosive fees and the permit costs and vola, it’s yours.
Getting shell for these arms is a problem, but not insurmountable
65
posted on
09/21/2019 2:39:11 PM PDT
by
bill1952
(taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.)
To: KobraKai
Right on! I want one of these...
66
posted on
09/21/2019 2:39:51 PM PDT
by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: Mr. Mojo
I think you can. What I'm pretty sure of is that you can't buy a warhead.
Spent tubes are/were sold by military surplus vendors. They have been turned in at gun buybacks (For a profit. Many police don't know that once fired, they are harmless and useless.)
67
posted on
09/21/2019 2:42:18 PM PDT
by
Sooth2222
("Every nation gets the government it deserves." -Joseph de Maistre)
To: Mr. Mojo
Holy crap. Hell hath frozen over. I actually agree with Irish Bob Beto on a subject. I would love to own a bazooka, it would be great fun to go to a bazooka range and blow shit up. I had occasion back in the late 80’s early 90’s time frame to shoot a grenade launcher, 20mm if I remember correctly, at range in East County San Diego where Police Swat teams and the Marines/Navy used. It was great fun I must say.
68
posted on
09/21/2019 2:42:30 PM PDT
by
fatman6502002
((The Team The Team The Team - Bo Schembechler circa 1969))
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Blow up those APCs that swat will send to kill you and your family 👪
69
posted on
09/21/2019 2:43:13 PM PDT
by
bill1952
(taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.)
To: Mr. Mojo
I lost my bazooka in a tragic boating accident.
70
posted on
09/21/2019 2:44:04 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This Space For Rant)
To: Mr. Mojo
If you can afford it why not. Good way to fend off the commie horse when they come for your stuff en mass.
71
posted on
09/21/2019 2:47:32 PM PDT
by
fruser1
To: Mr. Mojo
after a gun-totting mother in Aurora, Colorado No bias at all...
72
posted on
09/21/2019 2:48:02 PM PDT
by
bill1952
(taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.)
To: Mr. Mojo
Beto O'Rourke: If You Can Own an AR-15, Why Not a Bazooka?
To: IronJack
Reducto ad absurdum
“reduction to the absurd”
74
posted on
09/21/2019 2:52:04 PM PDT
by
bill1952
(taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.)
To: Mr. Mojo
75
posted on
09/21/2019 2:54:28 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
(Anyone who believes Epstein killed himself is a fool)
To: Mr. Mojo
I’m all for it, but I really want a MK19.
To: Mr. Mojo
1) The plain wording of the Second Amendment protects our right to own anything from pointed sticks to nuclear weapons. Anyone who doesn't like that is welcome to sponsor an amendment ...
2) The hazard and expense of keeping and bearing bombs, rockets, ships, airplanes, etc. is sufficient to render the point moot.
77
posted on
09/21/2019 2:55:53 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: Mr. Mojo
a gun-totting mother in Aurora, ColoradoMa Barker?
78
posted on
09/21/2019 2:56:20 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(The Electoral College is the firewall protecting us from massive blue state vote fraud.)
To: Mr. Mojo
Well, he’s right. And yes, if the Constitution were, in fact observed in the entire law, there would be no restrictions on owning bazookas or thermonuclear bombs. The 2Amd is absolute in the wording, admitting of no exceptions. There are other extraConstitutional restrictions on the owning of any arms and they are market restrictions- who can afford an ICBM? What company would build them for sale to the general public?
79
posted on
09/21/2019 2:57:09 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(XF8vc..,menhc)
To: SaveFerris
For the price of a plane ticket to Afghanistan, he’d have no trouble getting an armload of RPGs, cheap ... if the tribesment don’t slit his throat.
80
posted on
09/21/2019 2:57:41 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-188 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson