[Repealthe17thAmendment]

The Democrat mole is using the cover of the whistleblower statute in order to get the story out there without exposing themselves to charges of leaking classified information.

Whoever it was knew the ins and outs of the law, as seen by the legal structure of the written complaint. This was not a case where someone saw something and said something. This is clearly a case of someone abusing the whistleblower statute, and their inside knowledge as an intelligence officer in order to gain a political edge for the Democrats.

[1Old Pro]

This is clearly a case of someone abusing the whistleblower statute, and their inside knowledge as an intelligence officer in order to gain a political edge for the Democrats.

Yep, fire him and try him for stealing and releasing classified protected government secrets.

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

Excellent summary statement. Thank you

[Redwood71]

“Whoever it was knew the ins and outs of the law, as seen by the legal structure of the written complaint.”

The whoever you mention doesn’t know very much. Funny thing here is that it states in the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him.

So in the efforts of the witness to remain nameless, which is in the best interest of both the witness and the accusing party, there is only one way they will be able to keep that witness nameless. And a nameless corpse won’t be able to tell any tales. It’s been done before.

rwood