I wonder if this writer knows what’s in the new agreement. I don”t yet, but this is the same BS used to put NAFTA over on the American public. Sounds like she found some of the old 1992-1993 talking points. Not exactly thrilled to read this, but will wait for other analyses from other sources.
Indeed, the Birchers have a list on their website of what is wrong with this agreement. There may be many good things about it, excluding the managed trade with wages in Mexico and autos, but it also puts us under some provisions of UNCLOS (Law of the Sea Treaty), and it allows the supranational supervisory entity to have all kinds of sub-committees. All you should really need to resolve trade disputes under this agreement is one modest-sized committee. Just 3 or 4 people from each country would do in the one committee. The actual bureaucracy this new agreement would create, on the other hand, is shamefully large and complex.
And then, there is some globalist gobbledygook language copied from the TPP, including the ability to override each country's immigration statutes to facilitate free trade in services.
Hey, the agreement is 2,425 pages in length. What could POSSIBLY go WRONG???