I didn’t catch that, but I don’t really see that as all that bad. I believe Bongino speaks extemporaneously, and I know he gets a lot of tiny details wrong, most of the time he seems to catch himself before it gets set in cement!
But I do believe he gets the larger points right. There is a LOT of information he puts out. And he backs it up.
And he did say “This hasn’t been proven”.
But I will say...it sure fits better than anything else I have heard. It has been a bit of a puzzle to me when that unmasking list came out, because that occurred to me right away-that there was no unmasking request between 12/29 (The Call) and 1/4 (The day before the meeting where Strzok called off the dogs who were going to close out the case)
It fits and it is bad, but I still think the biggest stink to come is going to be wholesale spying on people for any reason they wanted. It was all done at the direction of Obama, but Presidents almost always have plausible deniability as underlings actually carry these things out “in their name.”
I am not sure the big bomb will ever drop because I don’t think the uniparty wants to admit just how bad surveillance has become and just how many people have access to it. There is NO DOUBT in my mind that the Obama administration abused the hell out of this and thought they had nothing to worry about with Hillary being certain to win - until she didn’t.