Posted on 05/20/2020 1:46:59 PM PDT by Kaslin
Feminist author Susan Faludi made a lame attempt in The New York Times to help feminists escape from the hypocrisy of believing all female "survivors" of sexual harassment or assault. Somehow, Faludi claimed that feminists never said you should believe all women.
The headline was "'Believe All Women' Is a Right-Wing Trap: How Feminists Got Stuck Answering for a Canard." She claimed the canard came from me, among others, and quoted my recent article about Joe Biden accuser Tara Reade in which I wrote: "Where is the #MeToo movement on this story? What happened to their rigid 'Believe All Women' boilerplate?"
She attempted to rebut, writing: "It's never been feminist 'boilerplate.' What we are witnessing is another instance of the right decrying what it imagines the American women's movement to be." Wrong. We're decrying the feminist habit of excusing the Bill Clintons and slut shaming the accusers of Democrats. They are now protecting Biden after they attempted to strike a blow for unlimited abortion by throwing unsubstantiated charges at Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh.
Faludi did some impressive-sounding Twitter sleuthing, insisting the hashtag #BelieveAllWomen is used mostly by conservatives. But underneath all that, the attempted rebuttal falls flat on its face. She admitted, "In my online searches, I encountered some feminists who seemed genuinely to subscribe to the phrase." It's not hard to find.
Faludi even quotes Hillary Clinton's semi-infamous tweet from 2015 that reads: "To every survivor of sexual assault ... you have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed." The "right to be believed"! Hillary never applied that to her husband's accusers. Biden said in 2018, "For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you've got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she's talking about is real."
The attempt to escape the hypocrisy charge doesn't meet the laugh test. Another prominent feminist writer, Jill Filipovic, tweeted: "This from Susan Faludi is so important. Feminists never said 'believe all women' - the right inserted the 'all.' Feminists said 'believe women': that is, start with the assumption that women are telling the truth instead of reflexively doubting them."
That's a distinction without a difference. Faludi and Filipovic can see that the "prestige" press largely waited a month to acknowledge Tara Reade was making an accusation against Joe Biden -- in other words, the press was "reflexively doubting" her.
President Donald Trump's deputy director of communications for rapid response, Matt Wolking, tweeted a picture of feminists holding a huge sign during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation hearings that said, "We Believe All Survivors," and a headline from the feminist site Bustle that read, "Why 'Believe Women' Means Believing Women Without Exception."
The author of that piece was Jenny Hollander. She has a new Marie Claire article on Reade's allegation that reflexively doubts Reade and reads like a Biden press release. It carries 165 words of denial from Biden and not one word from Reade.
The attempt to escape the hypocrisy charge doesn't meet the laugh test. Another prominent feminist writer, Jill Filipovic, tweeted: "This from Susan Faludi is so important. Feminists never said 'believe all women' - the right inserted the 'all.' Feminists said 'believe women': that is, start with the assumption that women are telling the truth instead of reflexively doubting them."
That's a distinction without a difference. Faludi and Filipovic can see that the "prestige" press largely waited a month to acknowledge Tara Reade was making an accusation against Joe Biden -- in other words, the press was "reflexively doubting" her.
President Donald Trump's deputy director of communications for rapid response, Matt Wolking, tweeted a picture of feminists holding a huge sign during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation hearings that said, "We Believe All Survivors," and a headline from the feminist site Bustle that read, "Why 'Believe Women' Means Believing Women Without Exception."
The author of that piece was Jenny Hollander. She has a new Marie Claire article on Reade's allegation that reflexively doubts Reade and reads like a Biden press release. It carries 165 words of denial from Biden and not one word from Reade.
Not new. They believed Anita Hill and spent the rest of the nineties defending Bill Clinton against a boatload of accusers. They just know people have no memories.
Believe All Women*
*: Except when the woman is accusing a Democrat.
Just as an aside, what is a feminist author? Are there masculinist authors? Caucasianist authors? Blackist authors (actually there probably are those who describe themselves as such I'm sure)? And... so... on...
I reject the term “survivors” for someone who might have been grope (felt up).
Last I heard; no one ever died from this. By making it sound like every woman who was ever touched without their permission (which is wrong) are somehow survivors is wrong on every level and mocks those who were actually in danger; even just a little bit.
Feminism always complains about the “patriarchy”, right?
Well, now .... I have a suggestion:
“let us all start yapping about the GYNARCHY, and let us see what becomes of it?
I would like to be a hilarious author.
"(But some women are more equal than others.)"
AKA Animal Farm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.