Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nonsporting
It’s more a sense that I get from Aristotle’s philosophy — particularly his Nichomachean Ethics and Politics — that Aristotle’s ethical concerns were broader and more unified with his natural philosophy, if you will, than Plato’s.
11 posted on 07/30/2020 5:44:57 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: eastsider
Plato and Aristotle: How do they differ?

I thought this short analysis helpful.

I can appreciate this final paragraph.

According to Aristotle, states may be classified according to the number of their rulers and the interests in which they govern. Rule by one person in the interest of all is monarchy; rule by one person in his own interest is tyranny. Rule by a minority in the interest of all is aristocracy; rule by a minority in the interest of itself is oligarchy. Rule by a majority in the interest of all is “polity”; rule by a majority in its own interest—i.e., mob rule—is “democracy.” In theory, the best form of government is monarchy, and the next best is aristocracy. However, because monarchy and aristocracy frequently devolve into tyranny and oligarchy, respectively, in practice the best form is polity.

Plato’s Republic would be a wicked, tyrannical oligarchy.

12 posted on 07/30/2020 6:05:20 AM PDT by nonsporting (Death to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson