Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: coloradan

AN is not a “high explosive” in the technical sense. It has explosive potential when stored improperly & exposed to fire. Multiple examples have been cited in this thread & elsewhere.


20 posted on 08/07/2020 8:33:38 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: T-Bird45

The correct term is blasting agent.


21 posted on 08/07/2020 8:51:21 AM PDT by Colt1851Navy (What was wrong with Nixon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: T-Bird45

I disagree.

If it is capable of detonating, then, it is by definition a high explosive, and, the multiple examples of it doing so is proof of that.

The fact that pure AN is not used commercially as a high explosive, e.g. because it’s better mixed with fuel oil, does not alter the fact that the pure material itself is capable of detonation.


25 posted on 08/07/2020 9:14:56 AM PDT by coloradan (The Enemy Media isn't chartered to inform but rather to advance the interests of certain elites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson