[Jim W N]

I guess you said that on another thread. Dang, you’re challenging me all over the place. I don’t mind as long as it’s in good faith. That’s what we’re here for.

On this thread you said that elections are not won or lost on such things. You didn’t say “U.S. elections”. As far as U.S. elections, probably not. But there’s potential long-term damage, especially if it bounces such a good ally as Bibi.

[Dave W]

Jim - you are confused and all over the place. You responded to me and said something like, How "is that our business". I never wrote that.

Bibi did not lose because of giving up land...research.

Also, you must not be aware, but Bibi formed a unity government after the third general election. The agreement gave Bibi only 18 more months and then his time in office is over. The PM will then be assumed by his rival...I forget his name.

Bibi is NOT giving up land - good grief...why don't you actually read the agreement. My god.