Posted on 08/19/2020 12:29:52 PM PDT by KamalaKancel
Newest post, from 1976 Canadian VISA application.
Mother of Kamala Harris a self-declared "Citizen of India" (in her sworn statement of the mid-1970's). From official records.
Can a US "Natural Born Citizen" also be a Citizen of India (by birth)??
https://twitter.com/KamalaKancel/with_replies
https://twitter.com/KamalaKancel/with_replies
More to come! Follow @kamalakancel (TW)
Yes. Other countries do not have the power to control eligibility to our offices.
Born in Oakland California — a simple citizen of the US. Not sufficient to be a Natural Born Citizen.
Mother a citizen of India — does the mother’s child automatically become a citizen of India at birth? I’m not sure. But that would be 2 national allegiances.
Father a citizen of Jamaica — does the father’s child automatically become a citizen of Jamaica at birth? I’m not sure. But that would be 3 national allegiances.
“””Can a US “Natural Born Citizen” also be a Citizen of India (by birth)?? “””
Only a democrat can do it as laws don’t apply to them.
The better question is should an anchor baby be eligible to be President.
“Yes. Other countries do not have the power to control eligibility to our offices.”
The Birthers seem to “think” otherwise.
It’s not doxxing, when you redact half the information on the page and don’t include all pages of the documents.
Who gave you the authority to define ‘natural born ‘ citizenship? The original intent... ‘we the people are government’ and only two US citizen parents, birthing their child bestowed ‘ natural born’ US citizenship. Go monkey around with some other nation’s GOD Given blessings.. we do not need curses from people who need to tinker with original intent.
I see the anti-Constitutionalist crowd is already here telling us that foreigners are naturally Americans.
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.
Hence every U.S. Citizen must accept this definition or categorical designation, and fulfill his constitutional duties accordingly. No member of Congress, no judge of the Federal Judiciary, no elected or appointed official in Federal or State government has the right to use any other definition; and if he does, he is acting unlawfully, because unconstitutionally.
I’ve known Indians who had children born here and the answer is no. When they went back home they actually had to apply for a visa for their child, a US Citizen, to enter India.
Who made you the boss?
Thanks
You don’t have a clue.
If interested, follow on TW @kamalakancel
I believe in this context "Dox" is simply short for "documents", not the illegal dumping of somebody's current home address or phone number on the internet.
An anchor baby is one born to a parent or parents who do not have a legal right to be in the US. Both my parents were foreign nationals when I was born, but both were resident aliens in this country legally. Therefore, I am not an anchor baby. If Harris' parents were in this country legally when she was born she would not be considered an anchor baby.
“”” If Harris’ parents were in this country legally when she was born she would not be considered an anchor baby. “”””
She would and is considered a HO, Jim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.