That's going to be super easy -- barely an inconvenience.
Even the WSJ misses the Federal Property angle of Sedition.
Does not an organized conspiracy to destroy federal court houses and other buildings meet the definition? Or does it more properly fit under Treason statutes?
The statutes read clearly to me:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-115
Re “legal experts”. They can shove their legal books up their dumb asses. Sedition laws (the old Alien & Seditions laws of WW1, plus the early ones during the post-independence ear ( the various farmers revolts/Whisky Rebellion, etc - minor insurrections) were used, with force in some cases.
The “legal experts” these WSJ dumkoffs refer to, as well as “civil rights/constitutional rights” organizations are the usual Marxist suspects and their parallel liberal stooges are - the ACLU; Center for Constitutional Rights (a CPUSA front, National Lawyers Guild split-off creation - very Marxist) as well as the still existant and active NLG, esp. their chapters in law schools; the old CPUSA legal front the National Emergency Civil Liberties Committee (NECLC); La Raza’s Legal Defense arm; the same for the BLM movement’s legal arm; the Castroite/old Soviet affiliated front, the National Conference of Black Lawyers/International Association of Democratic Lawyers - KGB/CPSU creation, often based in Cuba, along with the Marxist Association of American Jurists).