Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wayne07

For what it’s worth, Saddam Hussein was not going to rule Iraq forever. His sons would take over and that would spark a Shi’ite uprising. But yeah, at the same time, not our problem. But I do not really blame President Bush for taking out Saddam Hussein. Now we know he was bluffing because he did not want to look weak in front of his opponents in Iraq and of course, his next door neighbor Iran.


148 posted on 09/17/2020 9:12:32 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: MinorityRepublican

Taking out Saddam tipped the balance of power to Iran which is a much bigger threat, and bigger exporter of war and terrorism. Even worse is the 4,418 dead US soldiers, 31,994 wounded. Not a good trade for taking out Saddam. Plus it triggered the Arab spring, and creation of ISIS. Total disaster. And all premised on the claim of WMD, which was either completely wrong, or extremely thin depending on how you read the evidence.


150 posted on 09/17/2020 11:01:21 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson