Her Catholicism isn’t issue, not that she is a mainstream Catholic. She has explicitly stated faith comes before the law as a judge. That’s not what we need on our courts. That’s not a religious test, that’s a question of whether she is a textualist or if she’ll start at her conclusion and work towards it with tortured legal justification based on her personal religious beliefs. A bigger concern is her support for lockdowns and pattern of deference to government and big businesses over individual rights.
... She has explicitly stated faith comes before the law as a judge. That’s not what we need on our courts...
So you think she should just abide by Roe v Wade which is the ‘law’, and not use her ‘faith’ as a Catholic to possibly change the law?
“She has explicitly stated faith comes before the law as a judge.”
In recent days they have been playing a video clip of her saying the EXACT OPPOSITE.
Specifically, Amy Coney Barrett said that she would “never impose my own personal convictions upon the law.”