Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gattaca

Wonder how long before CDC revises or contradicts this report.

Funny to me is that I have been arguing with the mask sheep/nazis that the mask may be 20% effective, it is looking more like 15%.


11 posted on 10/13/2020 3:34:20 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: where's_the_Outrage?
Just a few days ago, a story on one of the local (Seattle area) news stations claimed that masks decreased the chances of contracting the virus by 40-80%. I thought that the huge amount of wiggle room between the upper and lower estimates was suspicious, and that a truly scientific analysis would have had much more precision.

Now, it seems that one CDC analysis showed the reduced risk to be only about 15%, even though it was based on a small sample. I wonder what sampling and what evidence was behind the 40-80% figure.

Another aspect is the time factor. The study cited in this story looked back at the previous two weeks before the test, but it's possible that over a longer time period the benefit of the masks would be even less.
39 posted on 10/13/2020 10:21:41 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson