Yup. Pdjt has to win by at least ten points if we can’t stop the dnc election theft scheme
It may boil down to NC.
Can’t let it be any closer than a full 2% victory (without rounding) to overcome fraud.
It will not
Trump will win both by 10 plus points
Fear not.
The courts are backing the fraud, no signature verification required, days, weeks past election day to receive and count ballots. I’m terrified we’re going to lose it all because we let too many of these traitors in high positions.
“People who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.” -Joseph Stalin
One more... “America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.” -Joseph Stalin
IF it takes till Friday, the Democrats are engaging in ballot stuffing and other forms of BALLOT FRAUD!
We should know by TUESDAY at the latest.
I have no faith in our institutions writ large. I expect leftist democrats to theive, steal, surppress, lie, cheat and do everything illegal or immoral to steal this election.
JoMa
So...the last few election cycles, these (and other) assclowns have dragged out the count, for whatever reason, beyond the date of the election. Ballots found in lockers, car trunks, dumpsters, post offices, etc.
How is it, then, that these same places had no problems over the prior 200 or so years? Perhaps we just never heard about it?
Inquiring minds want to know. Guess it’s time for some more research...
We’ve been through this a hundred times.
On Dec. 14 the elector slates must be transmitted to the US Senate and Archivist. Thus they must be certified at some point before that.
There are no stated penalties for not transmitting, except for the state’s Secretary of State (a minor fine). While in most cases the Secretary of State “certifies” the count, a STATE LEGISLATURE may transmit the electors names regardless. There is nothing in the Constitution or the statutory law about how and when electors must be certified before that transmission date. If there is, I missed it.
It is the legislature’s job, and only the legislature’s, to transmit the elector slate. The governors play no role, except that the Secretary of State is under their executive branch.
If a goofball governor such as Witless Protection transmitted her own competing slate, the Senate would ignore it. Yes. Yertile would throw this out faster than a Milli Vanilli greatest hits album.
If, for some reason, a slate is NOT sent on time, both the Senate and the US Archivist may demand it (but no teeth in this). However, statute law says that a Federal court in the state may also demand it. Now you’re talking contempt, etc.
Is there an example of a state that didn’t transmit? The Confederate states had not yet withdrawn from the Union by Nov. 1860 and their electors all went to other people. I haven’t looked into the actual senate count, so I don’t know if elector slates were ever actually sent from South Carolina, Georgia, etc.
Since the requirement is that all electors shall be counted on the same day, my guess is if some state was withholding electors, the president would be elected from those whose slates were submitted, but this is murky. Some say it must be 435, others say it is a majority of those submitted.
Regardless, I don’t think it will go that far. Both the pressure from the US Senate, the courts, and most of all, the state legislatures in MI, PA, and WI which are red would all see that “a” slate is submitted.
So, the short answer is, No, the Dems cannot “likely certify their respective state’s vote for Biden.”