In essence, you’re arguing the absence of observed crime is a testament to the irrationality of laws against crime.
“In essence, you’re arguing the absence of observed crime is a testament to the irrationality of laws against crime.”
“absence of observed crime”
So you admit you don’t know what you are talking about.
Does there exists, in the world. a person who thinks that laws against crime are irrational? I never came close to such a stupid utterance. Stop trying to be intellectual. It is beyond your skill set.