Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: matt04

I really wish that people would research what the Article III Standing requirement actually is before making that tired remark.


18 posted on 10/01/2021 2:53:32 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGurl24

That’s interesting.

Deep State didn’t want their puppet SCOTUS to lose another fig leaf...?


29 posted on 10/01/2021 2:57:53 PM PDT by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGurl24
I really wish that people would research what the Article III Standing requirement actually is before making that tired remark.

I suspect it was a sarcastic comment borne of weariness over various courts’ abuse of the principle of standing, simply using it as an excuse to avoid getting involved in politically touchy issues. I understand the sentiment, though standing was not the issue here.

Constantly claiming lack of standing, though, has destroyed the credibility of the court system. It appears that they simply don’t want to do anything, and hide behind “standing” to avoid involvement. It’s gotten to the point where it seems that citizens no longer have any effective access to the “justice system”, and that causes well-deserved general distrust in the courts.

59 posted on 10/01/2021 3:20:54 PM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson