Kyle: "Towards the fire in the Duramax."
Prosecutor: "So you decide you need to run to the fire at the Duramax?"
Kyle: "Yes."
Prosecutor: "Why? What was so urgent?"
Kyle: "It was a fire?"
Posted on 11/10/2021 8:07:36 AM PST by Red Badger
Not even with a different prosecutor?.........................
Prejudice is a legal term with different meanings when used in criminal, civil, or common law. In legal context “prejudice” differs from the more common use of the word and thus has specific technical meanings. Two of the more common applications of the word are as part of the terms “with prejudice” and “without prejudice”. In general, an action taken with prejudice is final. For example, “dismissal with prejudice” forbids a party to refile the case, and might occur either because of misconduct on the part of the party who filed the claim or criminal complaint, or the result of an out of court agreement or settlement. Dismissal “without prejudice” allows the party the option to refile, and is often a response to procedural or technical problems with the filing that the party could correct when filing again
Knowing how the left behaves, Kyle can look forward to the kind of future Zimmerman is having.
Thank you for the clarifications!................
This DA guy is grasping at straws trying to trick the witness and not elicit the truth.
What made you think YOU should put out fires?
Ah, to stop my community from being burned down.
“Motion request....dismissal with prejudice. Wow.”
*************************************************
The judge has that motion “under advisement” meaning he wants more time to research and consider such a HUGE decision. He certainly has a lot of Prosecutorial misconduct that he can look at.
Even if he wins this they will sue him in civil court for Wrongful death..Never be able to own anything for years and years..The standards for Wrongful death are much lower..
I wish the defense would object to some of these where the DA is not asking a QUESTION. He is saying “you felt this...”, “.... you decided this...”, etc. and then “Correct?”.
Red flag?
The DA is all over the place. Not connecting any dots.
Kyle: "Towards the fire in the Duramax."
Prosecutor: "So you decide you need to run to the fire at the Duramax?"
Kyle: "Yes."
Prosecutor: "Why? What was so urgent?"
Kyle: "It was a fire?"
Agree, thought crimes
That's a real possibility.
The process is the punishment.
In that video, I swear those people in the background are yelling, “Let’s go, Brandon.” How prescient!
In some states, a self-defense in criminal case cuts off the right to a civil claim. Not sure if Wisconsin is like this but somehting makes me think it is.
Different from beating a murder rap on basis of “I didn’t do it.” — OJ.
Here we go.
The DA is breaking all kinds of decorum, Defense needs to object more.
Well a cousin of mine killed his ex and beat the murder rap but her family chased him for years in Civil court.
sh** NO!
this kid should not have to go through another trial
A not guilty verdict is important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.