Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: old curmudgeon

I get the impression you’re desperate to find something wrong in all this. Careful, you risk falling in with all the low IQ, anti-American narratives.

The Rittenhouse victory was a great victory for the cause of defending America.

Meanwhile, if you think your argument will hold, first you’ll have to criticize all the 17 year old patriots who fought the British in the Revolution.


404 posted on 11/21/2021 12:44:12 AM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

Like so many others, you totally miss my point.

The trial was about self defense.

There were some remarks made here relating to self defense.

I made the comment that one of the first rules of self defense is to avoid situations where self defense is likely to be required.

Bars after midnight, riots, etc.

My remark was meant as a word of caution to those who think the courts are right every time. Every honest lawyer will tell you that court is a crap shoot.

But I suspect that he wishes he had stayed home that night.


405 posted on 11/21/2021 7:26:57 AM PST by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so bad that the federal government can not make worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson