Correct me if I’m wrong here.
700 out of 47,500 employees choose not to get vaccinated
46,800 out of 47,500 employees choose to get vaccinated
So...
98.5% of medical professionals chose vaccination
1.5% of medical professionals chose no vaccination
This does not favor the opinion that the vaccination is dangerous.
Or it could just show that even healthcare employees can be coerced.
This does not favor the opinion that the vaccination is dangerous.
AND IT CLEARLY SAYS, NOT EVERYONE THINKS IT IS SAFE.
This does not favor the opinion that the vaccination is dangerous.
................................................
Right, and the only people on the planet who would definitely contend that that’s beside the point are the thousands (possibly hundreds of thousands) who have been incapacitated and or KILLED from that experimental vaccine! BUT, as the saying goes: “Oh look, there’s a squirrel!”
The problem here is with integrity bias. Most professionals have integrity. They act with honesty and fidelity, and assume other professionals in their field do as well. They do not do research or delve into thescience, they assume others, like themselves have integrity and honesty and would not lie or lead them astray. They are easily misled.
There is another group that need their jobs and gamble they are not being misled and just comply so they can support their families, pay their mortgages and bills.
You cannot use either of these groups as supporting the vaccine because dishonest compliance and forced compliance are not informed consent. They both consented, but under false pretenses.
Their consent gives no indication of whether the vaccine is dangerous.
This does not favor the opinion that the vaccination is dangerous.
*****************************************
You are making a conclusion without citing any evidence.
What we have with those who got the jab are The actions of people who are not fully informed, and have “made decisions” that were essentially dictated to them.
You are conflating actions with opinion. And then trying to make an argument as to evidence that the vaccine is “safe and effective”?