Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Is the FDA’s Juul Ban Supposed to Help?
The New American ^ | June 30, 2022 | Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 07/01/2022 8:28:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

There’s something terrifying about a government so powerful that it can shut down your business overnight without even bothering to offer substantive arguments. Yet that’s what Food and Drug Administration bureaucrats just did to the e-cigarette company Juul. While Juul got a stay of execution from a court, the company is one of the many victims of the FDA’s counterproductive war on nicotine. Most of the other victims will be cigarette smokers.

I have followed the issue for several years and there is no doubt in my mind that Juul is an effective way to transition away from smoking into alternative, safer sources of nicotine. Vaping doesn’t end nicotine consumption, but it’s still a real step toward a world without cigarettes. In fact, it is now proven that e-cigarettes are more effective than traditional, FDA-approved nicotine-replacement therapies at getting smokers to quit entirely.

In its 125,000-page application to the FDA, Juul reminded the agency of more than 110 studies showing the benefits of e-cigarettes over traditional nicotine consumption. The company has also been a good team player, jumping through all the hoops thrown at it by the anti-vaping brigades. As the Reason Foundation’s Guy Bentley reminds us in the Daily News, “Juul complied with nearly every request made by critics including pulling its original marketing campaigns in 2016, voluntarily removing all of its non-tobacco and menthol flavors from the market in 2019, and supporting an increase in the tobacco age from 18 to 21.”

And yet the FDA has ordered all Juul e-cigarette products off the market even though its own decision features this remarkable admission: “To date, the FDA has not received clinical information to suggest an immediate hazard associated with the use of the JUUL device or JUULpods.” In other words, neither Juul’s effectiveness in turning smokers away from more dangerous...

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: ban; fda; juul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2022 8:28:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The left want to,ban them because “they are bad for kids” but then scream like lunatics when the right ban abortions because they are bad for kids”


2 posted on 07/01/2022 8:31:54 AM PDT by Bob434 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Juul’s competitors who bribed some democrats, presumably.


3 posted on 07/01/2022 8:33:05 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The principle to apply here is simple. It’s none of the government’s business.


4 posted on 07/01/2022 8:33:39 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
oh come on....its the tobacco industry....

just like pushing how terrible liquor is helped the weed industry....

just follow the money....

5 posted on 07/01/2022 8:34:49 AM PDT by cherry (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Who? Some other manufacturer of e-cigs or...the tobacco companies.


6 posted on 07/01/2022 8:39:40 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Great minds drink alike...me and my baby havin' a hell of a night. - - BB King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How can they kill one company but leave their competitors in business?


7 posted on 07/01/2022 8:41:32 AM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

Meanwhile, Deep State is all for legalizing weed.

Okaaaaay...


8 posted on 07/01/2022 8:44:56 AM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

This is from BI, but it may still explain a lot.

https://www.businessinsider.com/juul-timeline-from-startup-to-tobacco-company-challenges-bans-2019-9

Check out the Pritzker family involvement before the company was sold to Altria...


9 posted on 07/01/2022 8:48:25 AM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Doesn’t this run afoul of yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling? Congress would have to pass this as a law, rather than letting unelected bureaucrats issue an edict.


10 posted on 07/01/2022 8:52:33 AM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

In the late 60s the demoncrats lost the electoral lock on the southern states and thus their major contributor base from predominantly southern industries, oil and tobacco. Unsurprisingly, they have been at war with those businesses ever since!
They lie about their concern for children’s safety over tobacco use. They lie about everything!


11 posted on 07/01/2022 8:53:57 AM PDT by cartoonistx ( the feeling of fainting! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Vaping is a drug delivery system.

Med stuff.

To be regulated by States.

Like alcohol, weed and other fun stuff.


12 posted on 07/01/2022 9:03:26 AM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cartoonistx

someone mentioned that the juul ban was to profit tobacco companies- this may have been done to get support by ‘big tobacco’ again- so basically the left smear and attack ‘big tobacco’ (and others like oil), then turn around and try to win back support by attacking their competitors now that the damage has been done by the attacks on tobacco already-


13 posted on 07/01/2022 9:04:08 AM PDT by Bob434 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
How can they kill one company but leave their competitors in business?

That is the real question. Juul has 75% of the marketplace because they early into the game, make a well liked product, were good at marketing and product placement. Just about every convenient store has Juul but many only carry Juul and no other options.

So the real answer is, Juul has been very successful and the Left likes to punish success.

14 posted on 07/01/2022 9:07:06 AM PDT by Pollard (If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The tobacco companies?


15 posted on 07/01/2022 9:10:45 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Juul get it’s nicotine from tobacco. Or so I’ve been told.


16 posted on 07/01/2022 9:16:19 AM PDT by cartoonistx ( the feeling of fainting! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cartoonistx

True- the comment about big tobacco wanting the ruling might not be right- it’s just weird that it has been banned when there isn’t any solid evidence of harm- cigarettes have a whole bunch of nasty junk in them- the eciggs don’t really-


17 posted on 07/01/2022 9:18:12 AM PDT by Bob434 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

[[So the real answer is, Juul has been very successful and the Left likes to punish success]]

True- its astonishing that we have 2 ‘viable parties’ in the nation- one that absolutely hates everyone, hates success (remember obama said “You didn’t build that”), hates our values- and somehow still wins elections even when they don’t cheat- (or get caught i should say i guess)

one [party is for progress- one is for destruction of all the progress we have made- their disdain for America’s greatness and advances is unreal-


18 posted on 07/01/2022 9:21:37 AM PDT by Bob434 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A judge put the kabosh on this earlier this week.


19 posted on 07/01/2022 9:41:02 AM PDT by LibertyWoman (America, the Handwriting is on the Wall. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Go see they didn’t complain the whole process will get there, they needed to make a hefty donation to the Democratic Party and then it would’ve sailed right through the FDA. I guess the extorted money from the tobacco companies is getting a little stale but it still seems to be buying them some mileage


20 posted on 07/01/2022 10:17:10 AM PDT by rottweiller_inc (inter canem et lupum )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson