Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hole_n_one

The crook was wearing a mask for the purpose of hiding his identity. We need some case or statute law establishing that as giving more weight to a victim being in fear of losing his life or suffering great bodily harm.


60 posted on 08/06/2022 12:50:30 PM PDT by familyop ("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: familyop
We need some case or statute law establishing ...

We need explicit laws which permit the use of lethal force to defend property in cases of robbery, whether it is by armed or unarmed perpetrators. Specifically, masked perpetrators should be considered an aggravating factor in a robbery and a mitigating factor for a person resisting a robbery by counterforce. Multiple perpetrators even more so.

The store owner was foolish to speak with reporters. They are agents of hostile organizations who consistently oppose any kind of citizen defense against criminal predation.

I would expect the store owner will be prosecuted for aggravated assault. And he might well be convicted of that under the State laws in effect today. That would depend on jury selection.

There could also be a civil suit. That robber who got stabbed looks to have been permanently disabled. Who is going to pay for his long-term care? Quite possibly, the store owner could be bankrupted by this.

"The process is the punishment." We need some major changes in laws.

61 posted on 08/06/2022 1:36:08 PM PDT by flamberge (Those who pose the greatest danger to you are living within five miles of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson