Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

Think you got it right.

Apparently since the Constitution doesn’t outright ban Ex Post Facto warrants, they can be used.

IOW, just go ahead and search, then when you find something, go get some toilet paper to cover your ass.


30 posted on 08/30/2022 10:49:02 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Regulator

“Apparently since the Constitution doesn’t outright ban Ex Post Facto warrants,”

Actually it does.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

There is nothing in the constitution allowing the kings men to break your door, take what they want, and then later go to their office and describe what they did.

What is not authorized in the constitution is forbidden, or left to the states.


36 posted on 08/30/2022 11:08:30 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator

“Apparently since the Constitution doesn’t outright ban Ex Post Facto warrants, they are allowed”

The Constitution doesn’t outright ban electrocuting your genitalia until you tell the the safe combination either. That doesn’t mean it’s allowed.


38 posted on 08/30/2022 11:15:56 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson