You are correct, sir. However, even for those of us (myself included) who can see how it could be interpreted either way, I still have a problem that President Trump was not 100% clear when talking about such a sensitive touchstone.
I’m not so sure. It’s repulsive to think of the “Termination” of the US Constitution, but the uncomfortable elephant in the room is this is exactly what we are allowing to happen by accepting the results of this fraud.
That isn’t what Trump called for, and the headline is yet another in an unending banzai charges of lame falsehoods and sound bites that seek to fill a narrative of “Deranged Orange Man” rather than answer the questions our last President asks, not just for himself but for the office, what would the founders do?
Does not fraud unravel all in law, and are we a nation captive to fraud because the law didn’t catch it in a timely manner?
A nation of laws cannot let fraud win over law and still be a nation of laws.
It is alarming about a very sensitive touchstone. It should be. Leaders lead with truth, not polls or feelings.
We cannot kick this can down the road much longer.