But that is not the only take that can be gleaned from what he wrote. He needs to clarify just what he meant.
Yes it is. Read it again. He is not the one who conducted the steal, and he illustrates just what those who did conduct the steal have done in its wake, concluding that the Founding Fathers would oppose everything those people have done—how can you mention the Founding Fathers, the framers of the Constitution, with any notion that they would approve of the termination of the document they fought to establish? You cannot, quite simply.