Some rare positive news.
Now to stretch that precedent to cover a bunch of old contrary rulings. Illegals shouldn't not be eligible for federally paid welfare and other benefits, other than that necessary for their decent survival until their illegal presence is promptly removed. Proper SCOTUS precedent could avoid the alternative of passing a legislative ban with added clauses stating such ban isn't judicially reviewable, ie. using those forgotten checks and balances. Removing federal $ incentives would be make a big dent in new illegal entrants and properly enforcing such would lead to a large wave of self deportations. Ending the legal fiction (promoted by a century of brain washing) that illegals' children, illegally born in US, are citizens at birth, removes another bad incentive. Had they effectively been under the jurisdiction of the US they'd have been born elsewhere! Obviously any such changes need to be well administered with adequate due process to protect real citizens and legal immigrants.
If individual states want to spend their own resources to subsidize such they may, at the risk of competitive pressure from wiser, pro legal resident, states.
I’ll bet it was the ‘Non-Biologist Supreme Court Judge’ who voted against this.
All these MIVs (Migrant Invader Vermin) have the unalienable “right” to be immediately deported via free-fall airdrop over their original home country...
The Preamble to the Constitution has been clear, The People of the United States.
If you’re not of the States, the Constitution doesn’t pertain to you.
About f’n time they did there job
Who was the one no vote? John Roberts?
Maybe SCOTUS should define what the term “illegal” means.
Duh?
American citizens are supposedly governed by the United States Constitution...
Folks from another country are bound by their laws (and *IF*/*WHEN* in the US, ours).
8 to 1? That’s higher than I thought! Was Roberts the 1?
This case was set for argument January 17, 2023 and has not been decided.
Many fake “conservative” websites proclaim a USSC decision without a link to the opinion. This case HAS NOT BEEN DECIDED.
The Deplorables want a Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement bill, missing since 1986 ONE TIME amnesty. Since that amnesty was granted already, a second amnesty is off the table. What remains is the enforcement the Democrats have disallowed since then.
The List of Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement, missing since 1986 goes like this -
1) southern barrier;
2) require eVerify to hire;
3) end all chain migration;
4) birthright per Minor v. Happersett (plural citizen parents = nat born citizen);
5) end work visas;
6) 40-year moratorium on all new applications for citizenship (to allow workplace automation effects on downsizing population);
7) Set up an illegal aliens’ victim restitution fund from tax on remittances. Use tax on remittances to replenish Social Security account.
Enactment of these provisions will motivate illegal aliens to SELF-deport, and remove colonizadors from our welfare rolls