.
Let me guess…Pfizer is probably resorting to “highly edited video” and “crazy conspiracies “ and “right wing nonsense “.
I didn’t read it but I’m guessing that’s their reply.
Already posted here, in full, non clickbait version.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4126665/posts
New York, N.Y., January 27, 2023 – Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight.
In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research. Working with collaborators, we have conducted research where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern. This work is undertaken once a new variant of concern has been identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way for us to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to induce antibodies that neutralize a newly identified variant of concern. We then make this data available through peer reviewed scientific journals and use it as one of the steps to determine whether a vaccine update is required.
In addition, to meet U.S. and global regulatory requirements for our oral treatment, PAXLOVID™, Pfizer undertakes in vitro work (e.g., in a laboratory culture dish) to identify potential resistance mutations to nirmatrelvir, one of PAXLOVID’s two components. With a naturally evolving virus, it is important to routinely assess the activity of an antiviral. Most of this work is conducted using computer simulations or mutations of the main protease–a non-infectious part of the virus. In a limited number of cases when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells. In addition, in vitro resistance selection experiments are undertaken in cells incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and nirmatrelvir in our secure Biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory to assess whether the main protease can mutate to yield resistant strains of the virus. It is important to note that these studies are required by U.S. and global regulators for all antiviral products and are carried out by many companies and academic institutions in the U.S. and around the world.
Fact-based information rooted in sound science is vitally important to overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic and Pfizer remains committed to transparency and helping alleviate the devastating burden of this disease.
It would be simplerfor them to say: “Biden and the Deep State have our back, so you’ll take whatever we force ito your body and be happy”
Pfuck Pfizer.
Cymru Local News ADVERTISEMENT Wales FM Mark Drakeford's wife dies suddenly
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/triple-play-saturday-january-28-2023
☕️ TRIPLE PLAY ☙ Saturday, January 28, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Pfizer finally speaks, but their words are lost in the news hurricane caused by the Paul Pelosi video drop and the Tyre Nichols video drop. Coincidence? Nah. Did Pfizer admit everything? Maybe.
1️⃣ First, note that Pfizer’s key exculpatory sentence sounds like a denial, but it is so narrow that it doesn’t actually deny anything, not really:
In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research.
It SOUNDS like a denial, but it only denies gain-of-function research on the CURRENTLY-USED vaccine. They are specifically NOT denying GoF on any other vaccine or, critically, on any other vaccines directed at SARS-CoV-2. They also didn’t mention their contractors or affiliates.
Here’s another way to look at it. Let’s rewrite that denial sentence as a “real” denial, without the lawyer equivocation. It would look like this:
Neither Pfizer nor its contractors and affiliates have ever conducted gain of function or directed evolution research.
See? It’s very easy to write a “real” denial. Pfizer’s lawyers were paid to make the non-denial sound like a real denial, by making it complicated and limited while sounding simple and broad.
2️⃣ Pfizer’s lawyers snuck the real admission in the second paragraph. In two difficult-to-read sentences that also sound a lot like denials, Pfizer actually admitted it is tinkering with dangerous viruses.
In a limited number of cases when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells. In addition, in vitro resistance selection experiments are undertaken in cells incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and nirmatrelvir in our secure Biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory to assess whether the main protease can mutate to yield resistant strains of the virus.
(The phrase “such virus” proves lawyers wrote this, if you’d doubted me. A dead giveaway.)
You might be tempted just to skim those two sentences and let your brain take a quick nap. That’s what Pfizer wants. I think Pfizer got its wires cross a little, intending this to a limited hangout disclosure, but also not wanting to be too clear about it.
Although seemingly part of the same thought, the two sentences are unrelated to each other. They are two different examples where Pfizer admits to performing GoF work, while simultaneously struggling to make the research sound limited, routine, and professional.
It’s like a teenager giving you a dense, complicated explanation for why he left the car keys outside his bedroom window.
(More at link)
When do we start the Nuremberg Trials?
If veritas exposes the scam, but nobody is there to hear it, does it make a sound? The BOOM is isolated to a relatively small corner of the internet. The vast majority will either never hear it, or hear a distorted version. For all practical purposes, it never happened.
Robert Malone, MD has been active (since its beginning) in exposing the wickedness of the COVID vaccine program.
-———Robert Malone—————
Deceptive videos used to link athlete deaths to COVID shots
For West’s family members, who have worked to raise awareness about sudden cardiac arrest through their Play for Jake Foundation, seeing his story co-opted in the service of spreading anti-vaccine misinformation has been distressing. His mother, Julie West, questioned whether those behind the videos ever considered the feelings of parents.
“My tragedy of losing my son is always upsetting, and to think that somebody would use that for their gain is very upsetting,” she said. “It’s mind-boggling to me that there are people out there like that that want to spread or have their own agenda.”
He thought it was so wicked he recommended we give it to our most vulnerable population.
Then he realized how lucrative the anti-vax grift could be.