This recent trend of women crawling out of the woodwork to accuse prominent political figures, who they just happen to hate for their politics, of sexual assault years after the incident is alleged to have happened is absurd, and the courts should dismiss these cases before trial.
I wonder what the health issues were for Trump’s witness — perhaps that the person got some veiled threat?
If the accused were a Rat, the plaintiff would no longer exist.
On the other hand, Trump embraces Due Process, and the judiciary, friend or foe, recognizes that.
George Conway.
/SPIT
will not put up a defense in his civil trial on allegations
That seems pretty arrogant and doomed to fail, especially in a NY courtroom.
Crushing victories are one of the best ways to stop this madness.
At this point if trump were convicted of 3 life terms from all these fake phony allegations we would still win in a landslide victory
Too bad he could not find a replacement expert witness psychologist to cancel the plaintiff’s expert witnesses. These paid expert witnesses have a way of cancelling each other out in a trial. In that sense, Trump’s attorney is ceding ground to the plaintiff, especially in a trial jurisdiction where he cannot get a fair jury pool.
It’s in NYC. It’s a waste of time for him to even show up.
I don’t understand why Trump believes a federal jury finding he committed rape helps him become president.
Can they even prove he was in the building?
Can they prove Trump met her?
Can they prove they were alone for a time?
No. Of course, that doesn’t mean a democrat jury full of Trump haters won’t find him guilty even before any trial begins.
The “judge” has interfered in this case from the start, essentially becoming part of the prosecution team. He objects to things that the lawyers representing Carroll didn’t object to.
E. Jean Carroll-Balsey-Ford
Raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman department store.
Yeah I bet Trump spends a lot of time in department stores and car washes huh Moe.