Unfortunately for Trump, section 3 is vague--it doesn't say that you have to be convicted of insurrection, only that someone "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the United States.
But voters are not voting for the candidates--they are voting for electors pledged to a particular candidate.
“Unfortunately for Trump, section 3 is vague—it doesn’t say that you have to be convicted of insurrection, only that someone “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the United States.”
I cannot see a Section 3 argument being approved by SCOTUS. Can you?