Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First US Abrams tanks arrive in Ukraine
The Hill ^ | September 25, 2023 | ELLEN MITCHELL

Posted on 09/25/2023 8:59:51 AM PDT by Timber Rattler

The first U.S. Abrams tanks pledged to Ukraine have arrived in the country and are being prepared to send into battle, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced Monday.

“Good news from Defense Minister [Rustem] Umerov. Abrams are already in Ukraine and are preparing to reinforce our brigades. I am grateful to our allies for fulfilling the agreements!” Zelensky wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Zelensky added that Ukraine is “looking for new contracts and expanding the geography of supply.”

The Pentagon confirmed the tanks arrived in Ukraine, with a spokesperson saying “the mere presence of Abrams tanks serves as a potent deterrent.”

“By having these tanks in their arsenal, the Ukrainian army can more effectively discourage aggressive actions,” the Defense Department spokesperson told The Hill. “We will continue to focus on what we can do to help Ukraine succeed on the battlefield and protect its people.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; Ukraine; War
KEYWORDS: abrams; armor; burnliketherest; globohomo; marinaabramovic; nato; satanism; tank; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Timber Rattler

I though you said this war was already over months ago? Why does the ukraine need US tanks now?


21 posted on 09/25/2023 9:33:55 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

“I hope they’re not the latest version. The Russkies would love to get one.”

Anyone thinking Russia and China and Iran doesn’t already have their spying citizens within those programs doesn’t know those programs.


22 posted on 09/25/2023 9:34:57 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frithguild

Your odds are better at Power Ball than surviving a tour in a tank.


23 posted on 09/25/2023 9:35:13 AM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Daddy Warbucks in smiling today!!!


24 posted on 09/25/2023 9:38:43 AM PDT by The Louiswu (Pray for Peace in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

New targets!


25 posted on 09/25/2023 9:50:16 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

“More bad news for Muscovite tankers on the frontlines in Ukraine...”

Maybe, maybe not. US weapons are designed around a warfare plan. That plan includes integration with air assets and information delivery via satellite and or global hawk. The Abrams tank has changed greatly since it’s first version rolled off assembly lines in the 1970’s. The original 105 replaced with 120 mm gun. The original 42 tons now 73 tons. The speed and range has been effected by the weight increase of the tank. The tanks are completely integrated with the battlefield and soldiers now.

Giving an updated Abrams tank to Ukraine, without air superiority, air support, integration, and global hawks would be something like getting a Ferrari with a Fiat engine. It just isn’t the same thing, nor will it perform to the high standards people expect.

I expect the Abrams model to perform somewhere behind the Leopard II and the Challenger if they give the 43 ton version. It will still have problems in minefields. It will be vulnerable to artillery, mines, and missiles/drones. One particular problem with the Abrams is the fact that you have to follow it with a tanker of fuel (it can run on gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel technically).

The one think about the Abrams, that the Russians are aware but shocks people in real life is the speed. You take the governor off that tank and it is incredibly fast, especially for short distances. If they breakout (that’s a huge if), they can move very quickly and could show up in surprising places.

I am not confident that it will change any part of this war if they only have the 43 ton version, and no air support.


26 posted on 09/25/2023 9:50:38 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

They’ll be quite a trophy for the first to take one of them out. Probably already a spot for them in the Moscow Ukraine war display.


27 posted on 09/25/2023 9:55:39 AM PDT by McGruff (Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“Turns out what is a good deterrent is a US Army armored division.”

A military is one hell of a lot more than a bunch of dudes wearing the same color and cut of clothes. No matter how much expensive s-—t you give them.


28 posted on 09/25/2023 9:58:10 AM PDT by L,TOWM (An upraised middle finger is my virtue signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Battle tested and ready to go. Make it happen!


29 posted on 09/25/2023 10:02:06 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Next up reassembling of Pershing IIs

We are this is going to get out of hand quote territory.


30 posted on 09/25/2023 10:08:47 AM PDT by Mouton (US Home to one party rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

They said they won’t be on the front line. Only in for special ops.


31 posted on 09/25/2023 10:16:17 AM PDT by IDFbunny (Fat shaming works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete Dovgan
I am not confident that it will change any part of this war...

It's supposed to keep the war going until all evidence of the crimes of the WWOC (World Wide Organized Crime) Syndicate (made up of politicians,corporation heads,oligarchs, dictators, religious leaders,etc. ) has been destroyed and those who worked in and knew about the details of these operations (Ukraine citizens) can't testify because they are DEAD.

32 posted on 09/25/2023 10:55:28 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on flight MH370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

Blow a track off and call in artillery. Good luck with that. They’re sitting ducks once that happens.


33 posted on 09/25/2023 10:56:52 AM PDT by 1st I.D Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

To believe that you’d have to believe the Ukrainians have not been trained to maintain them. You’re also ignoring thee fact that any major repairs usually mean pulling part, sending it back to depot and swapping in a replacement. No one does a transmission overhaul in the field.


34 posted on 09/25/2023 11:06:16 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0LfgYd6ZN8


35 posted on 09/25/2023 11:07:05 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

The Abrams in Iraq were defeated by IEDs. Pack enough explosives in a hole in the ground and any armored vehicle is vulnerable, which is one reason why armor in a city or running the vehicles up and down the same road makes them so vulnerable. The Ukrainians have considerably more space to maneuver.


36 posted on 09/25/2023 11:10:04 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
Every dollar = a dead Russian!

At this point, it's probably down to 50 cents.

37 posted on 09/25/2023 11:10:57 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

The Ukrainians don't have the ability to protect tanks or what is left of their remaining conscripts (insufficient air support) so those Abrams are just theatre.

 In the notes I made after watching the video linked below, Poland and the US are backing away from the Ukraine but Nuland wants to escalate into WWIII as does Biden's handlers. I think Biden is only pretending to back away and encourage negotiations because of the public outcry. So now, as money is withdrawn, Biden/Nuland are going to try to escalate into WWIII.

Zelensky at the UN, kicking and screaming

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Zelensky at the UN, kicking and screaming , ransomnote wrote:

Kazan is the best!
I’m a bit too wordy but here it goes....

At the UN meeting, Zelensky said negative things about Russia and pushed for escalation.
Biden spoke but this time did not say that the US would back the Ukraine ‘for as long as it takes’.
Normally there is coverage of the UN meeting but this time, almost no coverage other than Milley announcing he’s retiring.
Poland and Zelensky are now trading insults. I’d read previously that Z was suing Poland over grain import/export and Poland scolded Z for that. Now POland says it will no longer give arms to Z.
Both men (video) believe that the Biden regime’s handlers would have had to have given Poland the green light to go after Zelensky like that, so that the US appears to be using Poland to pressure Zelensky to go to the negotiating table with Russia.
American attention is being shifted toward possible war with China and friction with Russia (apart from the Ukrainian situation).
Zelensky’s peace negotiations require Russia to leave every millimeter of Ukrainian land and past vast sums of reparations for damage done etc. so it’s not going to happen. Russia doesn’t have an incentive to back down.

Nuland is everywhere pushing for escalation.
The US wants to save face by having Zelensky be the one to call for negotiations, as if America always stood by their ‘man’.
Mercouris (Sp?) thinks this might be the beginning of the end as pressure is on Zelensky to negotiate and support is drifting away. However, he notes that Nuland and neocons are pushing for escalation so it’s not clear what they will do to make that happen.


38 posted on 09/25/2023 11:17:22 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
To believe that you’d have to believe the Ukrainians have not been trained to maintain them. You’re also ignoring thee fact that any major repairs usually mean pulling part, sending it back to depot and swapping in a replacement. No one does a transmission overhaul in the field.

Another silly zeeper response.

US Abrams crews are trained for 2 years, with constant exercises to maintain and improve operational ability. A few dozen Ukraine soldiers have been trained on these how long, exactly? MSM reports say "since the spring."

Simply put, Ukraine does NOT have the facilities or knowledge to maintain Abrams tanks. These things have turbine engines, which do not run on diesel. They will have tricky supply trains, and when one breaks down - it will need to be hauled all the way back to Germany for repairs. They also are, by all reports, the most stripped-down versions the US has. The Pentagon does not want any advanced models falling into Russian hands. The purpose of sending these tanks is PURELY for PR. To tell the Europeans, the Ukrainians and the World - "we are still in it" whether that is BS, or not. I realize another purpose of sending these tanks is to give encouragement and headline fodder to neocon trolls to continue to post their "wunderwaffen" BS on social media.

39 posted on 09/25/2023 11:18:56 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Tanks without air cover and battlespace management is problematic.

5.56mm


40 posted on 09/25/2023 11:23:22 AM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho have got to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson