“I do want to be clear that we think there are different principles that apply with those who are not law-abiding.”
Then prove they are not law abiding in a court of law. Then you won’t need to circumvent due process protections.
So the partner of a woman who has been beaten and threatened shouldn’t be disarmed before he/she is convicted?
And that is one key point.
*could simply make clear that the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to people who have been placed under a domestic violence restraining order*
The restraining order doesn’t even have to assess or find that the accused was not law-abiding, or represents an actual danger.