None dare call it Election Interference.
In fact, voters of all stripes are shocked by the pro-Palestinians in the Democrat Party.
Any state that does this should lose their electors and not be counted in a presidential election.
Biden either stole the election win in Colorado in 2020, or he had the pothead vote tied down.
insurrection ruling
insurrection findings
Who ruled? Who found?
In our twisted communist minds, we hereby find you guilty of insurrection and rule that we cannot allow you on the ballot because it’s a threat to “our democracy”(communist revolution)
Trump’s popularity is surging in Colorado so it’s time to kick him off the Colorado ballot?
What kind of third world tyranny are these lunatics attempting?
A judge made a comment that and these hyperbole-indulgent-haters of President Trump attempt to classify that comment as a judgement of guilt of a so-called act of insurrection.
Well past wishful thinking. Any court that bases a judgement consisting of disallowing President Trump of being on any ballot due to this comment should be shuttered and all judges involved permanently retired.
What’s the plan when he gets removed from the ballot? No biggie if it is California. He wasn’t going to win there anyway. But what if he is removed from the ballot in PA, AZ, and GA? What’s the plan?
Why take Trump off the ballot? The DemonRATS will CHEAT Obama’s way into a FOURTH TERM no matter what! They’ve committed FAR TOO MANY CRIMES to ever give up power.
Fake Newsweek’s pipe dream. That’s all they’re left with.
He hasn’t even been charged. How can a judge make a finding like that with no systematic examination of the relevant facts?
More unhinged everyday
Video
MSNBC’s Claire McCaskill: Trump is “even more dangerous” than Hitler
https://rumble.com/v3xf4kp-msnbcs-claire-mccaskill-trump-is-even-more-dangerous-than-hitler.html
Well, we have anti Trump people here as well.
She’s playing it both ways in order to be re-elected——that’s my guess.
Certainly at least one out of those 80 million might have "standing" in the opinion of the Court which in recent years has been reluctant to decide much of anything to do with elections. (I am well aware that elections are a matter reserved to the states, but I think this strategy may be in violation of other areas of the Constitution.)
The Supreme Court are cowards. Why adjudicate this 50 times? They’re all in on it.
Removing a popular front-runner from the ballot for any reason would be a slap in the face to We The People, especially when doing so would so clearly favor one political party over another.
I doubt the higher courts will allow it - the last thing they want is the appearance of the courts putting their heavy hand on an election.
But then again, I did not think the courts would dismiss challenges to the blatantly stolen 2020 election… so…I guess we are probably screwed.
The idiots down at Newsweak are all nervous wrecks. Their dream of a communist America where people can’t talk to each other is drifting away. All the “Karens” thought they’d be required to wear burkas by now.
They do not respect law or even the meaning of words and terms. There was unqualifiedly no insurrection of any kind. Questions about the election results are not in any way manner shape or form an attempt to overthrow the election. The Democrats themselves have questioned results many times.
There WILL be blood in the streets for this reason: The Left are not ruled by law or by reason but only by their own rage and hatred and absolute intolerance of the “other” . (That’s you and me).